From Fedora Project Wiki

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


* '''System Service bitcoind'''
* '''System Service bitcoind'''
** Should have its datadir somewhere like %{_datadir}bitcoind/ which expands to /var/lib/bitcoind/
** Should have its datadir somewhere like %{_datadir}bitcoinsys/ which expands to /var/lib/bitcoinsys/
** Config file <code>%config(noreplace) %{_datadir}/bitcoind/bitcoin.conf</code> with wallet disabled by default, but they could enable it with wallet=1 if they really want it.
** Config file <code>%config(noreplace) %{_datadir}/bitcoinsys/bitcoin.conf</code> with wallet disabled by default, but they could enable it with wallet=1 if they really want it.
** With system username like: <code>bitcoinservice</code>
** With system username like: <code>bitcoinsys</code>
** Wrapper should launch bitcoind in a context named like: <code>bitcoindservice_t</code>
** Wrapper should launch bitcoind in a context named like: <code>bitcoinsys_t</code>
** %doc README-FEDORA-BITCOIN-SERVICE should probably explain how the service is meant to be configured, used and controlled with bitcoin-cli or RPC/REST interfaces as the non-default datadir does not match upstream documentation and it thus may be non-obvious to users.
** %doc README-FEDORA-BITCOIN-SERVICE should probably explain how the service is meant to be configured, used and controlled with bitcoin-cli or RPC/REST interfaces as the non-default datadir does not match upstream documentation and it thus may be non-obvious to users.
* '''User service bitcoind and bitcoin-qt'''
* '''User service bitcoind and graphical bitcoin-qt'''
** The most common way in which Bitcoin Core users run their own bitcoind or bitcoin-qt with is as a non-root user with datadir <code>~/.bitcoin/</code>.
** The most common way in which Bitcoin Core users run their own bitcoind or bitcoin-qt with is as a non-root user with datadir <code>~/.bitcoin/</code>.
** There should be a separate user homedir SELinux policy for bitcoind and bitcoin-qt operated in this manner.
** There should be a separate user homedir SELinux policy for bitcoind and bitcoin-qt operated in this manner, with a context like <code>user_bitcoin_t</code>.
** Note: Arbitrary other services may need to be granted both UNIX filesystem and SELinux permission to read the autotoken file from the user's ~/.bitcoin directory.

Revision as of 02:43, 30 October 2015

RPM Package and SELinux

There probably should be two separate SELinux policy modules for the two different ways Bitcoin Core is used.

  • System Service bitcoind
    • Should have its datadir somewhere like %{_datadir}bitcoinsys/ which expands to /var/lib/bitcoinsys/
    • Config file %config(noreplace) %{_datadir}/bitcoinsys/bitcoin.conf with wallet disabled by default, but they could enable it with wallet=1 if they really want it.
    • With system username like: bitcoinsys
    • Wrapper should launch bitcoind in a context named like: bitcoinsys_t
    • %doc README-FEDORA-BITCOIN-SERVICE should probably explain how the service is meant to be configured, used and controlled with bitcoin-cli or RPC/REST interfaces as the non-default datadir does not match upstream documentation and it thus may be non-obvious to users.
  • User service bitcoind and graphical bitcoin-qt
    • The most common way in which Bitcoin Core users run their own bitcoind or bitcoin-qt with is as a non-root user with datadir ~/.bitcoin/.
    • There should be a separate user homedir SELinux policy for bitcoind and bitcoin-qt operated in this manner, with a context like user_bitcoin_t.
    • Note: Arbitrary other services may need to be granted both UNIX filesystem and SELinux permission to read the autotoken file from the user's ~/.bitcoin directory.