From Fedora Project Wiki

< FWN‎ | Beats

 
(34 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:Virtualization]] <!-- do not copy into FWN issue -->
[[Category:Virtualization]] <!-- do not copy into FWN issue -->


{{Anchor|Virtualization}}


{{Anchor|Virtualization}}


== Virtualization ==
== Virtualization ==
Line 14: Line 14:
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list].
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list].


==== KVM and Paravirtualization ====
==== Virt Status Report ====
The Linux Kernel-based Virtual Machine is a form of hardware assisted
[[JustinForbes|Justin Forbes]]
virtualization<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware-assisted_virtualization</ref>
posted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00056.html</ref> a Fedora virtualization status report.  
as opposed to software-only or paravirtualization. This means the underlying
Justin pointed out F13 bugs<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_bugs</ref> now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target.
hardware must have CPU features like Intel-VT or AMD-V. While common in the
last few years, there are still many servers in operation which lack these extensions.
 
[[GiovanniTirloni|Giovanni Tirloni]]
asked<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-October/msg00090.html</ref>
about the state of paravirtualization support in KVM, and
asked about a set of KVM patches<ref>http://people.redhat.com/mingo/kvm-paravirt-patches/</ref>.
 
[[DorLaor|Dor Laor]]
answered<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-October/msg00092.html</ref>
there is no plan to support non-VT hardware with KVM. While Xen is not
supported on Fedora, it is still a paravirtualization for such hardware option under Redhat 5.  


<references />
<references />


==== Installing Virtio Drivers in Windows XP Setup ====
==== RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity ====
[[RichardHughes|Richard Hughes]]
Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features<ref>http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/</ref> of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4
posted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-October/msg00101.html</ref>
compared to Fedora 12.
the following directions for installing VirtIO drivers<ref>http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/WindowsGuestDrivers/Download_Drivers</ref> during Windows XP setup.
 
* create a 1.44Mb image file
* mount it by loopback
* format it with vfat
* copy the {{filename|Install/Xp/x86/viostor.sys}}, {{filename|Install/Xp/x86/wnet.inf}}, and the txtsetup.oem file below to the root of the mounted image
* umount the loop device
* attach the floppy image as a floppy storage element in the VM's details pane
* boot the VM
* remember to press F6 when booting the windows xp setup and select the VirtoIO device.
 
File {{filename|txtsetup.oem}}:
<pre>
[Disks]
d1 = "Viostor SCSI driver disk",\disk1.tag,\
 
[Defaults]
SCSI = viostor
 
[SCSI]
viostor = "Viostor SCSI Controller"
 
[Files.SCSI.viostor]
driver = d1,viostor.sys,viostor
inf = d1,wnet.inf
 
[HardwareIds.scsi.viostor]
id = "PCI\VEN_1AF4&DEV_1001","viostor"
</pre>


Richard added "I'm still unable to install XP using ide, scsi or virtio drivers
[[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]]
as it gives the message "Setup was unable to format the partition. The
explained<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00040.html</ref>
disk maybe damaged." -- any ideas welcome."
"The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind
Fedora as you might think. The {{package|libvirt}} mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was
rebased to be near parity with [[Releases/11|Fedora 11]], and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is
also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of
kvm-83 and kvm-84."


<references />
<references />


=== Other Sources ===
==== Using Kernel Samepage Merging with KVM ====
An upcoming feature  of [[Releases/12|Fedora 12]] is
KSM<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KSM</ref>.
"Kernel SamePage Merging is a recent linux kernel feature which combines
identical memory pages from multiple processes into one copy on write memory
region."
[[HaydnSolomon|Haydn Solomon]] described<ref>http://www.linux-kvm.com/content/using-ksm-kernel-samepage-merging-kvm</ref> how KSM and KVM work together.


====  ====
<references />
<references />


=== Virtualization Tools List ===
==== ====
This section contains the discussion happening on the
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virt-tools-list virt-tools-list list].
 
==== libosinfo Revisited ====
[[ArjunRoy|Arjun Roy]]
revived<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2009-October/msg00091.html</ref>
discussion of a library to track details of OS distributions for use by tools
such as {{package|python-virtinst}} and <code>virt-inspector</code>. LibOSinfo was first proposed<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue180#libosinfo:_Library_for_Virt_OS.2Fdistro_Metadata</ref>
by [[ColeRobinson|Cole Robinson]].
 
<references />
<references />

Latest revision as of 18:09, 18 December 2009



Virtualization

In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the @fedora-virt list.

Contributing Writer: Dale Bewley

Fedora Virtualization List

This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-virt list.

Virt Status Report

Justin Forbes posted[1] a Fedora virtualization status report. Justin pointed out F13 bugs[2] now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target.

RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity

Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features[1] of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 compared to Fedora 12.

Daniel Berrange explained[2] "The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind Fedora as you might think. The Package-x-generic-16.pnglibvirt mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was rebased to be near parity with Fedora 11, and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of kvm-83 and kvm-84."