From Fedora Project Wiki

< FWN‎ | Beats

 
(146 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- shortcuts -->
{{Admon/warning|Stub|Need more replies}}
<!-- shortcuts -->
[[Category:Virtualization]] <!-- do not copy into FWN issue -->
[[Category:Virtualization]] <!-- do not copy into FWN issue -->


{{Anchor|Virtualization}}
{{Anchor|Virtualization}}


== Virtualization ==
== Virtualization ==
In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the @et-mgmnt-tools-list, @fedora-xen-list, and @libvirt-list and lists.
In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the
@fedora-virt list.


Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]]
Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]]
=== Enterprise Management Tools List ===
This section contains the discussion happening on the
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools et-mgmt-tools list]
====  ====
<references />


=== Fedora Virtualization List ===
=== Fedora Virtualization List ===
Line 22: Line 14:
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list].
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list].


==== Rawhide Virtualization Repository ====
==== Virt Status Report ====
[[MarkMcLoughlin|Mark McLoughlin]]
[[JustinForbes|Justin Forbes]]
announced<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-May/msg00074.html</ref>
posted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00056.html</ref> a Fedora virtualization status report.
the launce of the virt preview repo(FWN#171<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue171#Virtualization_Technology_Preview_Repo </ref>).
Justin pointed out F13 bugs<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_bugs</ref> now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target.
"We've set up a repository for people running Fedora 11 who would like
to test the rawhide/F12 virt packages. To use it, do e.g."
<pre>
  $> cat > /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-virt-preview.repo << EOF
  [rawvirt]
  name=Virtualization Rawhide for Fedora 11
  baseurl=http://markmc.fedorapeople.org/virt-preview/f11/$basearch/
  enabled=1
  gpgcheck=0
  EOF
  $> yum update
</pre>
 
Adding "this is very much a work-in-progress."
 
[[MarkMcLoughlin|Mark McLoughlin]]
decribed<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-May/msg00086.html</ref>
the different types of users consuming these packages:
 
* 1) Users who want things to stay stable and who aren't necessarily expecting new features until they update to F-12 - these are people with just the updates repo enabled
 
* 2) Same as (1) but who are willing to help out testing updates for the whole distro in order to catch things before they hit the people in category (1) - these people have the updates and updates-testing repos enabled
 
* 3) Mostly the same as (1) or (2), but have a specific interest in testing new virt features and are willing to deal with virt regressions - these people enable the updates, updates-testing and preview repos
 
* 4) People who are interested in helping with helping with F-12 development in general, not just virt - these people run rawhide
 
[[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]]
added<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-May/msg00081.html</ref>
"The virt-preview repo is intended primarily as an aid to testing / early
experimentation. It is not intended for 'production' deployment."


<references />
<references />


==== No libguestfs on Fedora 10 ====
==== RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity ====
[[JánONDREJ|Ján ONDREJ]]
Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features<ref>http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/</ref> of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4
referenced<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-May/msg00064.html</ref>
compared to Fedora 12.
FWN<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue175#libguestfs_on_non-Fedora_Platforms</ref> when asking if
[[RichardJones|Richard Jones]]
would consider including {{package|qemu}}-0.10 into {{package|libguestfs}} package to satisfy dependencies for Fedora 10.


Richard "had a go at backporting the changes to <code>qemu</code> that we ship in
[[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]]
F-10.  <code>qemu</code> in F-10 is based on <code>qemu</code> 0.9, and doesn't include the
explained<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00040.html</ref>
vmchannel patch." But "ended up with a qemu which compiled, but kept
"The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind
segfaulting, and it was tricky to diagnose exactly why."
Fedora as you might think. The {{package|libvirt}} mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was
 
rebased to be near parity with [[Releases/11|Fedora 11]], and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is
"Is it really a problem to use the <code>libguestfs</code><ref>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=package&terms=libguestfs</ref> and/or <code>qemu</code><ref>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=package&terms=qemu</ref> packages from
also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of
Fedora 11 builds?  You can grab the latest builds out of Koji."
kvm-83 and kvm-84."
"This worked OK for me, although I have now moved to using Fedora
11-Preview, and have mostly abandoned Fedora 10."
 
Daniel B and Mark Mc concurred, Fedora 11 is the place to get
<code>libguestfs</code> .


<references />
<references />


==== New Release virt-inspector ====
[[RichardJones|Richard Jones]]
announced<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-May/msg00073.html</ref>
"the first 'really working' version of <code>virt-inspector</code><ref>http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=libguestfs.git;a=summary
</ref>."
"This is a tool based around libguestfs which can inspect a virtual
machine disk image and tell you some interesting things about what's
inside it."
Some of the things virt-inspector can tell you:
* What operating system(s) are installed, and what distros and versions.  It currently covers RHEL releases, Fedora releases, Debian releases, and has limited support for Windows.
* How disk partitions are expected to be mounted (''eg. /dev/sda1 -> /boot'')
* What applications are installed.
* What kernel(s) are installed.
* What kernel modules are installed.


====  ====
<references />
<references />
=== Fedora Xen List ===
This section contains the discussion happening on the
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen fedora-xen list].
==== Xen 3.4.0 Released ====
[[PasiKärkkäinen|Pasi Kärkkäinen]]
forwarded<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-xen/2009-May/msg00014.html</ref>
an announcement from the Xen list.
"This release contains a number of important new features and updates
including:
* Device passthrough improvements, with particular emphasis on support for client devices (further support is available as part of the XCI project<ref>http://xenbits.xensource.com/xenclient/</ref>)
* RAS<ref>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability,_Availability_and_Serviceability</ref> features: cpu and memory offlining
* Power management - improved frequency/voltage controls and deep-sleep support. Scheduler and timers optimised for peak power savings.
* Support for the Viridian (Hyper-V) enlightenment interface
* Many other x86 and ia64 enhancements and fixes
[[Releases/11|Fedora 11]] includes {{package|xen|Xen}} version 3.3.1.
<references />
=== Libvirt List ===
This section contains the discussion happening on the
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list libvir-list].


====  ====
====  ====
<references />
<references />

Latest revision as of 18:09, 18 December 2009



Virtualization

In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the @fedora-virt list.

Contributing Writer: Dale Bewley

Fedora Virtualization List

This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-virt list.

Virt Status Report

Justin Forbes posted[1] a Fedora virtualization status report. Justin pointed out F13 bugs[2] now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target.

RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity

Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features[1] of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 compared to Fedora 12.

Daniel Berrange explained[2] "The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind Fedora as you might think. The Package-x-generic-16.pnglibvirt mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was rebased to be near parity with Fedora 11, and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of kvm-83 and kvm-84."