From Fedora Project Wiki

Line 32: Line 32:
=== Could have been better ===
=== Could have been better ===
{{Test_Results:Fedora_18_QA_Retrospective/bad}}
{{Test_Results:Fedora_18_QA_Retrospective/bad}}
# [[User:Wutao85|Wutao85]] - ''Reply in time'' - Due to some problem of my email, I have not give an in time reply to some bugs, this can be done better.


=== Wishlist ===
=== Wishlist ===

Revision as of 07:48, 21 September 2012

Introduction

This page is intended to gather feedback from the Fedora QA community on things that worked well and things that could have been better with the testing of Fedora 18. The feedback will be used as a basis for identifying areas for improvement for Fedora 18 testing. Any thoughts, big or small, are valuable. If someone already provided feedback similar to what you'd like to add, don't worry ... add your thoughts regardless.

For any questions or concerns, send mail to test@lists.fedoraproject.org.

Providing feedback

  • Gwjasu - I like ____ about the new ____ process

Adding feedback is fairly straight forward. If you already have a Fedora account ...

  1. Login to the wiki
  2. Select [Edit] for the appropriate section below.
  3. Add your feedback using the format:
    * ~~~ - I like ____ about the new ____ process
  4. When done, Submit your changes

Anonymous

If you do not have a Fedora account, follow the instructions below to submit anonymous feedback. Please note, mediawiki records the IP address associated with any anonymous page edits.

  1. Select the appropriate page for your feedback...
  2. Add your feedback using the format:
    * ~~~ - I like ____ about the new ____ process
  3. When done, Submit your changes

Feedback

Things that went well

Test Results:Fedora 18 QA Retrospective/good

  1. Wutao85 - New Testers - There are some new testers join in the Alpha testing. This is pretty exciting, the more people join in, the more high quality bugs can be caught.

Could have been better

  • Cpanceac - I wish, that f18 alpha was not declared GOLD, knowing that it will destroy data, by default. Even after such a decision was made, i wish the announcement informed us clearly that f18alpha *will destroy data*, and not wait one more week until the release notes become available.
  1. Wutao85 - Reply in time - Due to some problem of my email, I have not give an in time reply to some bugs, this can be done better.

Wishlist

  • Cpanceac - I don't know if this is the right place for this but i'd like to receive only messages from humans, on fedora test list, and not messages regarding some updated packages being released for {latest-1, latest, next, next+1} fedora versions.

Recommendations

After enough time has been given for feedback, the QA team will discuss and make recommendations on changes to prioritize for Fedora 18. This section organizes and lists the recommendations.

In order to coordinate efforts, and measure effectiveness of recommendations, please record and track any action taken in the Fedora 18 roadmap in the QA TRAC instance.

References