From Fedora Project Wiki

(Notes from meeting)
 
(Post w/categorization)
Line 63: Line 63:
** Paul hasn't had cycles to work on getting new Asterisk packages
** Paul hasn't had cycles to work on getting new Asterisk packages
   made to try out, but will work on it in April for the May meeting.
   made to try out, but will work on it in April for the May meeting.
[[Category:Board meetings]]

Revision as of 18:49, 25 March 2010

Roll Call

  • Present: Matt Domsch, Mike McGrath, Christopher Aillon, Colin Walters, Paul Frields, Dennis Gilmore, Chris Tyler
  • Regrets: Josh Boyer, Tom 'spot' Callaway, John Poelstra
  • Assigned meeting secretary: Paul Frields

Agenda

Trademark matter

  • Question to legal@fp.o asking for permission to use our logo in a T-shirt contest entry at the Linux Foundation
    • TM counsel reports we can give a specific permission that is limited in scope to just this contest entry, without setting broader precedent.
    • Inclined to give a specific permission for this since (a) it was
  sought, and (b) seems like a negligible risk
    • Thanks to the community member who asked in advance!
    • QUESTION: Does the Board agree we can grant a specific, limited
  permission for the creator to enter these two designs in the LF
  contest?

AGREED: No objections. Paul to note to requester.

Diagram progress

  • STATUS: In progress, Paul to give a short status
    • Met with Mo Duffy for some designer input
      • Presented purpose for the diagram
      • Got feedback, and will do some narrative and another iteration
    • ACTION: Paul working on next draft, will present to SWG+Board+FAB

FPL succession

Election schedule

  • STATUS: Draft is out on advisory-board list
    • Feedback from Board members encouraged
    • mdomsch: FESCo rules have specific rules
      • we should ask FESCo to reconcile this with a general project schedule-based policy
      • Is there any desire to change the way that town halls/questionnaires work?
    • pfrields: Light but generally positive response in Fedora community, and also from external free software communities as well
      • as long as people are interested in staffing it, OK to continue
      • make sure we have a way for people to get involved in the process if desired
    • ACTION: mdomsch to file ticket with FESCo explaining issue

FESCo Update Policy

  • STATUS: FESCo has posted a policy
    • https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_acceptance_criteria
    • Planning is still underway
    • Board members should keep an eye on progress
      • Does the plan so far meet our vision/requirements?
      • Implementation details will really be the key
      • Be mindful of people costs/requirements
    • pfrields: Outlined Board responsibilities above
    • mdomsch: Testimony to quality of FESCo discussion and vote -- no resulting uproar
    • mmcgrath: Having the known quantity of criteria has helped a lot
    • mdomsch: interested in possibility of a backport capability, but that's independent of the updates model and making them more stable
    • dgilmore: work is going forward on gathering info for a KoPeR capability
  • Board agree it's good to see people driving this idea to a conclusion

Next meeting

  • PROPOSED: Wed 2010-04-01 UTC 1600
    • This is a public IRC meeting
    • Paul hasn't had cycles to work on getting new Asterisk packages
  made to try out, but will work on it in April for the May meeting.