From Fedora Project Wiki

(Add %{_isa} into example for devel requires base package item)
(Missing "m" in Excemption anchor)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
The ''devel requires base package'' example does not reflect ''%{_isa}'' modifier introduced by new guide lines. --[[User:ppisar]]
 
The ''devel requires base package'' example does not reflect ''%{_isa}'' modifier introduced by new guide lines. --[[User:ppisar]]
 +
 +
----
 +
Anchor in link "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee#Review_Process_Exception_Procedure" is incorrect. Should be "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee#Review_Process_Exemption_Procedure"
 +
[[User:Hubbitus|Hubbitus]] ([[User talk:Hubbitus|talk]]) 20:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:51, 31 August 2016

Need update: Link to PackageReviewProcess missing, and there is no more fedora-packaging list

The fedora-packaging list still exists! https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging -User:Spot

Should use "permissible", not "permissable". --User:nphilipp

Are there guidelines in there against the inclusion of trivial stuff? Fche 23:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The devel requires base package example does not reflect %{_isa} modifier introduced by new guide lines. --User:ppisar


Anchor in link "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee#Review_Process_Exception_Procedure" is incorrect. Should be "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee#Review_Process_Exemption_Procedure" Hubbitus (talk) 20:51, 31 August 2016 (UTC)