From Fedora Project Wiki
(Initial page) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
** BugZilla: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571375 571375] | ** BugZilla: [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571375 571375] | ||
** Status: [http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/1739 Applied upstream] | ** Status: [http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/1739 Applied upstream] | ||
If you have some suggestions for another useful rpmlint features, please contact [[User:Rnovacek|Rnovacek]]. | |||
Revision as of 08:46, 19 March 2010
Draft Documents
These are documents in a draft state, you rely upon them at your own risk.
These are documents in a draft state, you rely upon them at your own risk.
Recently some requirements to rpmlint functionality occurs. This wiki page tries to summarize them and provide information about progress of the implementation.
- Rpmlint should check if there are manual page for each binary/script
- BugZilla: 572090
- Status: Patch proposed
- Rpmlint should check if there isn't two binaries with same name in the standard binary directories
- BugZilla: 572090
- Status: Applied upstream
- Rpmlint should check if specfile contains both Fedora and RHEL conditional
- BugZilla: 572158
- Status: Patch proposed
- Rpmlint should check macros in the comments
- BugZilla: 571375
- Status: Applied upstream
If you have some suggestions for another useful rpmlint features, please contact Rnovacek.