From Fedora Project Wiki
19 February 2010
- 16:0816:08, 19 February 2010 diff hist +120 N QA talk:Testcase desktop browser Created page with 'The expected results should also mention the download went well. -- ~~~~'
18 February 2010
- 16:0716:07, 18 February 2010 diff hist +163 User talk:Kparal/Proposal:Package update policy →critical path packages: new section
- 14:2114:21, 18 February 2010 diff hist +159 User talk:Kparal/Proposal:Package update policy →security updates QA check: new section
- 14:2014:20, 18 February 2010 diff hist +194 User talk:Kparal/Proposal:Package update policy →mandatory or discretionary?: new section
- 14:1114:11, 18 February 2010 diff hist −430 User:Kparal/Proposal:Package update policy remove the Restrictions section, because the only thing was already in the package update acceptance test plan
- 13:3613:36, 18 February 2010 diff hist +24 m User:Kparal/Proposal:Package update policy Upgrade Path test clarification
- 13:3113:31, 18 February 2010 diff hist +167 N User talk:Kparal/Proposal:Package update policy workflow more readable
- 13:1913:19, 18 February 2010 diff hist +41 m User:Kparal/Proposal:Package update policy link
- 13:0813:08, 18 February 2010 diff hist +4,311 N User:Kparal/Proposal:Package update policy first draft
- 12:5512:55, 18 February 2010 diff hist +38 User:Kparal Proposal:Package update policy
- 12:5012:50, 18 February 2010 diff hist +218 QA:Package Update Acceptance Test Plan Do we really want to test every build in Koji...?
17 February 2010
- 15:3215:32, 17 February 2010 diff hist +146 QA:Package Update Acceptance Test Plan * It is the responsibility of the waiver to ensure that he/she waives only false errors, not real problems.
- 15:0115:01, 17 February 2010 diff hist +15 m QA:Package Update Acceptance Test Plan qa team name
- 15:0015:00, 17 February 2010 diff hist −1 m QA:Package Update Acceptance Test Plan reword
- 14:5914:59, 17 February 2010 diff hist +61 m QA:Package Update Acceptance Test Plan links to teams
- 14:5214:52, 17 February 2010 diff hist +78 QA:Desktop validation results template improved links
- 14:5014:50, 17 February 2010 diff hist +75 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC Desktop improved links
- 09:0809:08, 17 February 2010 diff hist +13 Test Day:Current Test Day:2010-02-18 Color management
- 09:0709:07, 17 February 2010 diff hist +41 QA/Fedora 13 test days color management
16 February 2010
- 14:1614:16, 16 February 2010 diff hist +92 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install multiple passes
- 14:1514:15, 16 February 2010 diff hist +43 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install PackageSetsMinimalPackageInstall pass
- 14:0914:09, 16 February 2010 diff hist +7 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install InstallSourceNfs passed
- 13:4613:46, 16 February 2010 diff hist +7 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install Testcase Additional Http Repository passed
- 13:2213:22, 16 February 2010 diff hist −4 m QA:Package Update Acceptance Test Plan name repos correctly
- 13:2113:21, 16 February 2010 diff hist −1 m User:Kparal/Package update approaches once again
- 13:2113:21, 16 February 2010 diff hist −6 m User:Kparal/Package update approaches name repos correctly
- 12:0112:01, 16 February 2010 diff hist +81 User:Kparal Sandbox
- 11:3711:37, 16 February 2010 diff hist +135 QA:Fedora 13 Install Results Template added 'Multiple results' row
15 February 2010
- 17:2617:26, 15 February 2010 diff hist 0 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install fix bad bug number
- 17:2217:22, 15 February 2010 diff hist 0 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install bad bug number
- 17:2117:21, 15 February 2010 diff hist +14 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install InstallSourceHttp fail
- 17:1617:16, 15 February 2010 diff hist +30 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install InstallSourceDvd fail
- 16:1216:12, 15 February 2010 diff hist −37 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install PackageSetsDefaultPackageInstall - I think it should be fail
- 15:5515:55, 15 February 2010 diff hist +23 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install BootMethodsDvd pass
- 15:5015:50, 15 February 2010 diff hist +30 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install BootMethodsBootIso fail
- 15:4815:48, 15 February 2010 diff hist 0 m Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install fix link
- 15:3815:38, 15 February 2010 diff hist +14 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install Testcase_Mediakit_ISO_Size passed
- 15:3115:31, 15 February 2010 diff hist 0 Test Results:Fedora 13 Alpha TC2 Install Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts fail
- 15:3015:30, 15 February 2010 diff hist +2 QA:Fedora 13 Alpha TC Install Test Results double redirect is not automatic :) current
- 10:3310:33, 15 February 2010 diff hist +197 User:Kparal/Package update approaches add just references to Debian, let's not waste more time
12 February 2010
- 13:1213:12, 12 February 2010 diff hist +21 QA:Fedora 13 Alpha TC Install Test Results BootMethodsDvd fail
- 13:1013:10, 12 February 2010 diff hist +7 QA:Fedora 13 Alpha TC Install Test Results BootMethodsBootIso fail
- 13:0213:02, 12 February 2010 diff hist +14 QA:Fedora 13 Alpha TC Install Test Results BootMethodsBootIso fail
- 12:2312:23, 12 February 2010 diff hist +14 QA:Fedora 13 Alpha TC Install Test Results QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts fail
- 12:1712:17, 12 February 2010 diff hist −189 QA:Testcase Mediakit FileConflicts provide just a direct link to needed script
- 12:0912:09, 12 February 2010 diff hist 0 m QA:Package Update Acceptance Test Plan →Test Deliverables
- 10:4410:44, 12 February 2010 diff hist +1 QA:Package Update Acceptance Test Plan re-worded risks
- 10:3710:37, 12 February 2010 diff hist +7 QA:Fedora 13 Alpha TC Install Test Results QA:Testcase_Mediakit_Repoclosure pass
- 10:3610:36, 12 February 2010 diff hist +15 QA:Testcase Mediakit Repoclosure fix repoclosure command to only check the provided repo, not system repos
- 10:2410:24, 12 February 2010 diff hist +151 QA:Package Update Acceptance Test Plan add autoqa into test environment