From Fedora Project Wiki

(Bundled libs: lack of definition.)
 
m (Rathann moved page Packaging talk:Bundled Libraries to Talk:Bundled Libraries: Since bundling is no longer prohibited, it doesn't make sense to keep this under FPC control.)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
What I, somewhat newbie, miss here is a definition of a bundled library. Over time, I have began to develop  an understanding that it's related to having an "upstream". Still, it's far from clear to me.
What I, somewhat newbie, miss here is a definition of a bundled library. Over time, I have began to develop  an understanding that it's related to having an "upstream". Still, it's far from clear to me.
-- a shared library is there in one package. Bundled libraries come several times in several packages. See for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_(computing) and http://www.linuxtoday.com/developer/2010032502635OSDV . [[User:Pyluyten|Pyluyten]] ([[User talk:Pyluyten|talk]]) 10:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
It would be useful if this page linked to the updated policies it mentions. --ctubbsii

Latest revision as of 17:37, 28 April 2016

What I, somewhat newbie, miss here is a definition of a bundled library. Over time, I have began to develop an understanding that it's related to having an "upstream". Still, it's far from clear to me.


-- a shared library is there in one package. Bundled libraries come several times in several packages. See for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_(computing) and http://www.linuxtoday.com/developer/2010032502635OSDV . Pyluyten (talk) 10:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


It would be useful if this page linked to the updated policies it mentions. --ctubbsii