From Fedora Project Wiki

(New page: == Release notes == I'm not so sure that starting three bullet points in a row with "GDB" is the best way to go about describing the new features of GDB. For example, the second one could ...)
 
(→‎STL debugging: new section)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Release notes ==
== Release notes ==
I'm not so sure that starting three bullet points in a row with "GDB" is the best way to go about describing the new features of GDB. For example, the second one could easily be changed to "Python scripting is now supported. This is used to support the new type-specific pretty-printing feature." --[[User:Ianweller|Ian Weller]] 03:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
I'm not so sure that starting three bullet points in a row with "GDB" is the best way to go about describing the new features of GDB. For example, the second one could easily be changed to "Python scripting is now supported. This is used to support the new type-specific pretty-printing feature." --[[User:Ianweller|Ian Weller]] 03:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
== STL debugging ==
Am I right in thingking that one of the features is:
  "Pretty-printing has been implement for C++'s Standard Template Library.
  Programmers using it should find it considerably easier to read the output of
  STL variables in backtraces and in other debugging situations."
(and if so, is there a better way of wording this?  integrate with the bullet point about C++?)
--[[User:Dmalcolm|Dmalcolm]] 13:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:43, 27 January 2009

Release notes

I'm not so sure that starting three bullet points in a row with "GDB" is the best way to go about describing the new features of GDB. For example, the second one could easily be changed to "Python scripting is now supported. This is used to support the new type-specific pretty-printing feature." --Ian Weller 03:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

STL debugging

Am I right in thingking that one of the features is:

 "Pretty-printing has been implement for C++'s Standard Template Library.
  Programmers using it should find it considerably easier to read the output of
 STL variables in backtraces and in other debugging situations."

(and if so, is there a better way of wording this? integrate with the bullet point about C++?) --Dmalcolm 13:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)