From Fedora Project Wiki
(→Langpacks: new section) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Langpacks == | == Langpacks == | ||
There's a notice in the Language-support groups that it's been (partly) obsoleted by yum-langpacks—shouldn't we add a section called Langpacks for this? I had to ask on #fedora-devel to figure out what to do for my package to be properly supported by yum-langpacks. | There's a notice in the Language-support groups that it's been (partly) obsoleted by yum-langpacks—shouldn't we add a section called Langpacks for this? I had to ask on #fedora-devel to figure out what to do for my package to be properly supported by yum-langpacks. [[User:Mso|Mso]] 11:32, 11 Feb 2013 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:32, 11 February 2013
Name Change
I believe the name for this article is too verbose. "comps.xml" seems more appropriate, but I'm not an expert by any means on this. Thoughts? Dafrito 22:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
- There's already a redirect from comps.xml back here and according to the page naming guidelines, the general rule appears to be that we should use longer more descriptive titles. --Alexlan 18:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Langpacks
There's a notice in the Language-support groups that it's been (partly) obsoleted by yum-langpacks—shouldn't we add a section called Langpacks for this? I had to ask on #fedora-devel to figure out what to do for my package to be properly supported by yum-langpacks. Mso 11:32, 11 Feb 2013 (UTC)