From Fedora Project Wiki

m
Line 2: Line 2:
 
** [[User:jkeating]]: It's possible, but we'd have to explore what all consumes the version-release and what those consumers expect so that we don't badly break something's expectations.  This feels beyond the scope of this proposal though, feel free to make a new one.
 
** [[User:jkeating]]: It's possible, but we'd have to explore what all consumes the version-release and what those consumers expect so that we don't badly break something's expectations.  This feels beyond the scope of this proposal though, feel free to make a new one.
 
** [[User:Stijn]]: would like this as well, currently I have to special case some things in private code to determine 11.9x -> 12
 
** [[User:Stijn]]: would like this as well, currently I have to special case some things in private code to determine 11.9x -> 12
 +
 +
* [[User:Markmc|markmc]] The "only make images for pending release tree" could have been a proposal in its own right. Almost sounds like installer images should be built separately from the tree and new images should get pulled in only once they're fairly stable.

Revision as of 10:09, 12 June 2009

  • User:Bruno: Can we get the release version names to match the appropriate release. So that instead of a version-release of 11.93-1 We'd use 12-0.raw.1 or the like.
    • User:jkeating: It's possible, but we'd have to explore what all consumes the version-release and what those consumers expect so that we don't badly break something's expectations. This feels beyond the scope of this proposal though, feel free to make a new one.
    • User:Stijn: would like this as well, currently I have to special case some things in private code to determine 11.9x -> 12
  • markmc The "only make images for pending release tree" could have been a proposal in its own right. Almost sounds like installer images should be built separately from the tree and new images should get pulled in only once they're fairly stable.