From Fedora Project Wiki
(Cut out all stuff that doesn't seem relevant)
(Change names into a list)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
Specific people that are the owners of this SCL.  Once the SCL and SCL Metapackage are approved, the owners will be listed in the PackageDB as the Owners of the SCL Metapackage.  This section is who to contact before approval.
 
Specific people that are the owners of this SCL.  Once the SCL and SCL Metapackage are approved, the owners will be listed in the PackageDB as the Owners of the SCL Metapackage.  This section is who to contact before approval.
 
-->
 
-->
* Names: [[User:FASAcountName| Your Name]]
+
* Names:
<!-- Include email addresses that the maintainers can be reached should people want to contact you about helping with the SCL or technical issues need to be resolved. -->
+
** [[User:FASAcountName| Maintainer Name]] - <email address>  <!-- email addresses may be used to reach the maintainers prior to the SCL being approved -->
* Email: <email addresses for the maintainers so we can contact you about any specific technical issues.>
+
** [[User:FASAcountName| Maintainer2 Name]] - <maintainer2 email address>
  
 
== Detailed Description ==
 
== Detailed Description ==

Revision as of 02:54, 9 January 2014

Important.png
Comments and Explanations
The page source contains comments providing guidance to fill out each section. They are invisible when viewing this page. To read it, choose the "edit" link.
Copy the source to a new page before making changes! DO NOT EDIT THIS TEMPLATE FOR YOUR SCL REQUEST.


Warning.png
This page is a draft only
It is still under construction and content may change. Do not rely on the information on this page. This is a draft SCL Definition. It needs to be approved by the FPC before an SCL following this draft can be created. The FPC uses the criteria on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_(draft)#SCL_Criteria to evaluate whether the SCL is okay for Fedora.


SCL Name

Summary

Maintainers

Detailed Description

Packages in the Platform

Compatibility Guarantees

Warning.png
Security trumps compatibility
If a security issue needs to be fixed but that breaks backwards compatibility, the security issue will be fixed despite violating the guarantee. This page will be updated to mention the Fedora versions and the version of the relevant packages from the SCL which needed a backwards incompatible change to fix the issue).

(Bug for bug compat?) ()