From Fedora Project Wiki

(Few points)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
* "especially if some work has to be done from the infrastructure team" -- releng should be included in this as well.  Until a signing server is created, signing the packages will likely need either releng to help or infrastructure to create a separate sandbox for signing these packages.
 
* "especially if some work has to be done from the infrastructure team" -- releng should be included in this as well.  Until a signing server is created, signing the packages will likely need either releng to help or infrastructure to create a separate sandbox for signing these packages.
 
--[[User:Toshio|abadger1999]] 01:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Toshio|abadger1999]] 01:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Bugzilla ==
 +
* Will we continue to accept bug reports?
 +
* How can we maintain three versions when we can't maintain two?
 +
** http://tinyurl.com/4cavl2

Revision as of 16:36, 15 October 2008

  • "when a release goes EOL open all acls to uberpackagers" -- At least initially I'd rather see this applied to a single release. (ie: target F8 to be a long term release or target F9 as a long term release rather than all releases)
  • "Also it is not possible currently to report bug against these packages." -- I'm not certain but I don't think we have the ability to lock down bugzilla like this.
  • "especially if some work has to be done from the infrastructure team" -- releng should be included in this as well. Until a signing server is created, signing the packages will likely need either releng to help or infrastructure to create a separate sandbox for signing these packages.

--abadger1999 01:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Bugzilla

  • Will we continue to accept bug reports?
  • How can we maintain three versions when we can't maintain two?