User talk:Pfrields/Secondary trademark design: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:48, 8 October 2008

+1 for the nicununu ones. Bkearney
Although, I will still throw out that if I am Alfresco deploying a swanky appliance on Fedora.. do I think of it as a remix? I dont think so.Bkearney

- In my understanding, the use of this logo is optional, so a derivative is not forced to say "remix", we just don't want him to say "based on" or "derived from" (NicuBuculei 12:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC))
  - I understand I may be subvirting the process. I see value in my scenario (Swanky Alfresco Appliance on Fedora.. aka SAAF) of saying that the appliance is built on an unmodified fedora. Bkearney

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-- +1 for the nicununu ones.
+* +1 for the nicununu ones. [[User:Bkearney|Bkearney]]
-- Although, I will still throw out that if I am Alfresco deploying a swanky appliance on Fedroa.. do I think of it as a remix? I dont think so.
+* Although, I will still throw out that if I am Alfresco deploying a swanky appliance on Fedora.. do I think of it as a remix? I dont think so.[[User:Bkearney|Bkearney]]
-* In my understanding, the use of this logo is optional, so a derivative is not forced to say "remix", we just don't want him to say "based on" or "derived from" ([[User:Nicubunu|NicuBuculei]] 12:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC))
+** In my understanding, the use of this logo is optional, so a derivative is not forced to say "remix", we just don't want him to say "based on" or "derived from" ([[User:Nicubunu|NicuBuculei]] 12:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC))
+*** I understand I may be subvirting the process. I see value in my scenario (Swanky Alfresco Appliance on Fedora.. aka SAAF) of saying that the appliance is built on an unmodified fedora. [[User:Bkearney|Bkearney]]