From Fedora Project Wiki
QAFormat
When you review a package, it is better to do it in the standard way described on this page, to make it possible to automate the publishing of the package. Here is a proposal of the standard package for QA approvals (example for bash-completion):
PUBLISH +1 or NEEDSWORK Depending on reviewer's recommendation MD5SUMS: 4e22320fa05de9afb7ecc5b8d93d6343 bash-completion-0.0-0.fdr.3.20040331.src.rpm SRPM is always first and separated by a blank line 0150cfba28bdb6e8c4af3edf499bb5d6 bash-completion-20040331.tar.bz2 d19cbd44f21a9468c28d7f7dddba886b bash-completion.spec 9cd30bf23d82dacc6a0745ff972f6610 bash-completion.profile Sources: * bash-completion-20040331.tar.bz2: OK valid, canonical location * bash-completion.profile: OK appears to do good work Good: * Package name follows standard * SRPM Signature verified: - bcd241cb <ville.skytta(a)xemacs.org> * Builds without problems on FC1 * (Un)Installs/Upgrades without problems on FC1 * Runs on FC1 * Spec file -- Looked at and appears fine Needswork: list of problems encountered in the package review, if any Notes: Put here other things you want to add about the package