From Fedora Project Wiki

  • In the Test Plan section, could you give me an example of what a sufficient NetworkManager test would be? Do we need to test with every type of possible network, or just make sure you can bring the network up and down?
  • How about an example of HAL device mounting? Is that just "insert a flash drive and make sure it mounts"?
  • I'm guessing from the Test Plan that Package-x-generic-16.pnghal, Package-x-generic-16.pngNetworkManager, and Package-x-generic-16.pngPackageKit are among the most important affected packages. A complete sorted list follows:
[wwoods@brinstar ~]$ sudo repoquery -sf '/etc/dbus-1/system.d/*' --qf '%{NAME}' | sort -u
avahi
bluez
ConsoleKit
cups
cups-pk-helper
DeviceKit
DeviceKit-disks
DeviceKit-power
dnsmasq
fprintd
galago-daemon
GConf2
gdm
gnome-applets
gnome-lirc-properties
gnome-panel
gnome-system-monitor
gypsy
hal
kerneloops
modcluster
NetworkManager
NetworkManager-gnome
NetworkManager-openconnect
NetworkManager-openvpn
NetworkManager-pptp
NetworkManager-vpnc
odccm
oddjob
oddjob-mkhomedir
ohm
PackageKit
PolicyKit
ricci
setroubleshoot-server
sugar
system-config-printer-libs
system-config-samba
system-config-services
wpa_supplicant
yum-updatesd

Do any of these packages require special testing? --WillWoods 17:09, 26 February 2009 (UTC)