Search results

Page title matches

• Node.js/Packagers
  31 bytes (4 words) - 17:11, 25 April 2013
• EPEL/Packagers
  {{#fedoradocs:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-packagers-sig/}} = EPEL Packagers SIG =
  4 KB (683 words) - 20:40, 8 September 2021
• Packagers Guide Wishlist
  For Packagers Java Specifics in Fedora for Packagers
  5 KB (591 words) - 13:11, 26 March 2014
• Packagers for hire
  1 KB (164 words) - 08:52, 1 July 2021

Page text matches

• SELinuxModularity
  === Guidance for Packagers ===
  624 bytes (75 words) - 22:42, 20 September 2017
• Talk:Dist Git Branch Proposal
  == Other tasks - wiki procedure for packagers == I'm not sure if [[Using Fedora GIT]] is the main document for packagers, but it seems it will need changes to reflect these changes, esp. the "Bran
  447 bytes (76 words) - 23:38, 6 May 2011
• User:Bpepple
  == Sponsor of the following fedora packagers ==
  1 KB (131 words) - 15:18, 18 September 2017
• ContactingOtherDistroPackagers
  = Contacting fellow packagers from other distros = ...properly it might be a good idea to share your work/experience with fellow packagers from other distros and ask them todo the same with you. Especially if a pac
  925 bytes (147 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008

• File:Fedora Cheat Cube Packagers.svg Fedora Cheat Cube for Packagers (1,052 × 744 (527 KB)) - 18:25, 6 February 2011

• File:Fedora Cheat Cube Packagers.png Fedora Cheat Cube for Packagers (4,000 × 2,828 (1.39 MB)) - 03:48, 20 September 2014

• Archive:EPEL/ContributorStatus
  = Which Fedora Packagers are not interested in EPEL? = Not all Fedora Packagers are interested in participating in the EPEL effort. That's fine.
  981 bytes (149 words) - 16:34, 16 March 2017
• SIGs/OCaml
  == Packagers/Reviewers/People interested in helping ==
  1 KB (167 words) - 05:41, 16 October 2010
• Opinions on Fedora fonts
  ...rites] in February 2009 our new packaging templates are much easier on new packagers. ....org/2009/02/01/font-rock/ article] in February 2009. The efforts of fonts packagers in 2008 were not in vain!
  1 KB (197 words) - 19:15, 17 February 2009
• User:Renich/Projects/Fedorian Nation
  === Local Packagers User Groups === ...ations. Local companies, governments and schools could sponsor mirrors and packagers; making Fedora a much more serious contender.
  1 KB (200 words) - 17:13, 27 May 2012
• Extras/Schedule/FC6MassRebuild
  * Make sure all packagers/contributors are still around just like we did during the mass rebuild for * Packagers have 3 weeks (ie. until September 18) to rebuild, just like in the AWOL pol
  4 KB (557 words) - 19:16, 28 May 2008
• Archive talk:Policy for reviewing Publican documents
  I'm curious - is there precedent for making $foo-packagers groups when packaging $foo is very different from "regular packaging"? [[Us
  199 bytes (27 words) - 19:16, 21 November 2009
• User:Pertusus/Draft keeping infra open for EOL
  ...l to the distribution that are generally maintained in the distribution by packagers not interested in maintaining their package for a longer time than 13 month ...eecomes possible to see what packages have somebody who cares, and also if packagers are not wanting to maintain too much packages.
  2 KB (416 words) - 18:24, 10 November 2008
• Archive:PackagingDrafts/ReviewGuideline for fonts (2009-01-22)
  * fonts are easier to miss than headers, even experienced packagers have forgotten to look for them in the past ...-trivial to package properly, we had to write specific macros because many packagers were messing up scriptlets
  1 KB (214 words) - 18:53, 27 February 2009
• SIGs/Ada
  == Members/Packagers/Reviewers ==
  2 KB (185 words) - 07:55, 12 November 2020
• Changes/FedoraAtomicCI
  == Continuous Integration workflow for packagers == ...tinuous integration will bring testing to the front of the process, giving packagers of packages in Atomic Host feedback and gating for each change to those pac
  2 KB (311 words) - 10:32, 28 April 2017
• PackagingDrafts/BuildOnPrimaryArchitecture
  ...into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture.''' Fedora packagers should make every effort to support all primary architectures. ...boot utility, microcode loader, or hardware configuration tool).''' Fedora packagers should make every effort to support all primary architectures.
  1 KB (139 words) - 18:03, 13 October 2011
• Archive:Fr FR/Extras/PagePrincipaleDeveloppeurs
  ...- Various tips on tracking upstream projects to coordinate effectively for packagers * [[Extras/UsefulScripts| Packaging Scripts ]] - Handy scripts for Extras packagers.
  1 KB (201 words) - 20:46, 16 February 2010
• Archive:PackagingDrafts/BuildRoot
  .... The real issue is that this consumes large amounts of discussion time of packagers, reviewers, people on the packaging commitee and people on fesco w/o any sa ...there is no guideline to not use "<code>rm -rf /etc</code>", so why should packagers not be handled as grown-ups when choosing a "!BuildRoot:" tag as well?
  4 KB (578 words) - 21:39, 21 February 2009
• GitLab
  ==Packagers==
  1 KB (218 words) - 09:12, 5 May 2016