From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- ...to a -devel package. See the [[Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages| Devel Packages Guideline]] if you are unclear on what these files are. [19] === Devel Packages ===2 KB (260 words) - 15:52, 5 October 2011
- The following packages ship Flash files. While I haven't gone through all of them, none of them I /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typepadapp/static/soundmanager/soundmanager2.swf10 KB (1,433 words) - 21:38, 1 August 2013
- 35 bytes (4 words) - 20:56, 21 June 2010
- Install yum-utils and issue the following command to see what packages are using package "foo":422 bytes (56 words) - 22:04, 22 February 2009
- = Harden All Packages <!-- The name of your change proposal --> = ...rdened. Beginning with Fedora 23 this will now become the defaults for all packages. You can compare the security by running the following as root:12 KB (1,867 words) - 08:50, 9 January 2019
- == Proposed Packages to be included in Live CD (already in Fedora) == * We are first working to include these packages in Fedora, the list of packages to be in Live CD will come later. Please, follow-up all work throught [[SIG317 bytes (49 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- ...zio utente. Al suo posto ora si usa [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/qemu qemu]4 KB (451 words) - 08:10, 3 April 2012
- 334 bytes (47 words) - 01:23, 9 March 2015
- 44 bytes (6 words) - 22:50, 11 January 2009
File:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.png (1,250 × 700 (67 KB)) - 18:02, 6 August 2008- 661 bytes (67 words) - 14:11, 6 December 2013
- 44 bytes (6 words) - 22:50, 11 January 2009
- ...tries, should be opened once a few minor details are sorted and respective packages are updated to current versions '''for review'''.}}2 KB (259 words) - 17:58, 13 May 2012
File:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.svg (58 KB) - 18:03, 6 August 2008- 936 bytes (95 words) - 14:12, 6 December 2013
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Packages/mediawiki118]]48 bytes (5 words) - 19:22, 21 November 2014
- == Network configuration packages == There is no uniform way to test the following packages.5 KB (741 words) - 10:42, 14 December 2015
- ...aproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Orphaning_Process/ orphaned packages]. This keeps out unowned software and prevents future problems down the roa # Retriring packages nobody wants to adopt.3 KB (483 words) - 20:28, 2 October 2021
- * changes to isolated/leaf package without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution * limited scope changes without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution16 KB (2,506 words) - 18:28, 23 June 2020
- = Packages for Embedded Development =4 KB (618 words) - 21:38, 13 December 2010
Page text matches
File:NoarchCandidates.txt List of "source packages: sub packages" that should be convertable to noarch without any work as they do neither c(51 KB) - 10:30, 15 June 2009- To assist packagers in bringing Telepathy-related packages to Fedora and assisting in their continued maintenance by providing timely == Telepathy packages awaiting review ==720 bytes (87 words) - 05:09, 20 August 2008
- == Packages Maintained == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/mintojoseph406 bytes (53 words) - 12:46, 2 June 2011
- == Packages I maintain: ==488 bytes (71 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- ...eMaintainers]] for details about how packages, including core distribution packages, are now maintained. Please do not refer to Fedora as "Fedora Core" anymore521 bytes (73 words) - 09:51, 11 February 2011
- === Orphaned Packages === * Discussed some issues with orphaned packages:1 KB (151 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
- === Guidelines Around Compatibility Packages === == Compatibility Packages ==1 KB (205 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
- List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in [[L10N GUI]]2 KB (265 words) - 10:45, 8 April 2017
- == My packages ==919 bytes (140 words) - 22:49, 5 March 2009
- * Building packages for inclusion in EPEL/Extras. == Packages ==930 bytes (127 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
- == Fedora Packages I Maintain/Co-maintain == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/dgoodwin349 bytes (39 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- === Packages === ...e list of my packages see the [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/anishpatil current list in Fedora Pkg Db]574 bytes (81 words) - 13:07, 15 January 2014
- ...'', '''Eclipse''', and '''Apache Tomcat''', as well as other Java software packages included in this release, are compatible with this environment. Refer to this section of the Release Notes for information on installing Java packages:1 KB (201 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
- I like Fedora a lot, and I would like to contribute and maintain a lot new of packages to Fedora that are currently unavailable to Fedora Users. ...interested in providing Haskell packages (from [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pkg-list.html Hackage Repository]) for the GHC Haskell compiler.670 bytes (97 words) - 19:15, 28 August 2008
- === Bundled packages already in Fedora === === Bundled packages which should be fine to put in Fedora ===2 KB (248 words) - 09:23, 12 August 2014
- * Orphaned Packages will be droped if no one steps up to maintain them ...a specific date; 2:obsoleted by a newer version; 3: still fc4 as disstag) packages before branching/when FC5 is released1 KB (188 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- * pirut will only be able to install packages listed in comps.xml ...tly should be listed in the comps file (e.g. no devel, libs or perl-module packages=769 bytes (116 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
- '''Updating firefox will break the packages listed below for each release, unless they are rebuilt and updates are push ...ageMaintainers/UsefulScripts| ]] to look up and email the owners of those packages. [http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/files/pkgquery.py ivazquez' pkgquery.py]2 KB (252 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
- = Packages Lacking Extras Bugzilla Components = This is a list of packages which lack Extras Bugzilla Components. If you think it should have an Extr580 bytes (88 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
- ...I'm the unix sysadmin for the Biology department at Duke - so most of the packages I'm working on for Fedora Extras are bioinformatics related somehow. ...of the bioperl and deps and is currently (2007-03-27) pushing the orphaned packages through a re-review process.1 KB (174 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008