From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- * changes to isolated/leaf package without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution * limited scope changes without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution6 KB (1,000 words) - 13:54, 28 February 2014
- #REDIRECT [[Changes/Automatic Provides for Python RPM Packages]]64 bytes (8 words) - 15:58, 24 June 2016
- 236 bytes (36 words) - 20:39, 7 June 2021
- 226 bytes (37 words) - 05:59, 26 June 2021
- List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_GUI3 KB (368 words) - 22:00, 31 August 2016
- = Rust Crate Packages For Release Branches = This Change proposal aims to enable shipping Rust crate packages (<code>rust-$CRATE_NAME</code>) on release branches of fedora.7 KB (1,085 words) - 20:10, 7 October 2020
- 332 bytes (50 words) - 18:14, 7 July 2021
- = AArch64 Stage 4 Problem Packages List = This page is used to document current problem packages (fail to build) in Stage 4 of the Fedora AArch64 bootstrap. It provides a105 KB (14,459 words) - 14:43, 6 November 2014
- 297 bytes (42 words) - 07:57, 20 February 2017
- = Rename libusb packages and deprecate old API = ...provide an automated update path for the old `libusb` build dependency as packages should–and likely can–be updated to use `libusb1`.13 KB (2,083 words) - 20:25, 3 March 2021
- ...doraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages ...naming [[Packaging:FontsPolicy|guidelines]] requires the changing of many packages, while maintaining a working upgrade path.</noinclude>5 KB (790 words) - 11:07, 9 October 2021
- 27 bytes (4 words) - 03:52, 25 May 2008
- ...not amusing when offenders were marginal games, but when core distribution packages make the same mistakes we have a problem. == No bundling of fonts in other packages ==2 KB (298 words) - 14:13, 20 October 2011
- = Use license macro in RPMs for packages in Cloud Image = # In addition to the desired space-savings, this installs packages without their possibly-mandatory license files5 KB (744 words) - 15:21, 13 October 2014
- ...marily to document the historical decisions which led to this selection of packages. = Mandatory Packages =6 KB (892 words) - 00:16, 14 November 2012
- === Packages in Design Suite ===884 bytes (79 words) - 19:16, 21 August 2013
- == Bundled Packages == A set of packages ranged from graphics to typefaces included in the [[Design Suite|Design Sui4 KB (469 words) - 00:11, 10 April 2021
Page text matches
- = A proposal to add several packages to the Exception List = I believe the following packages should be present in every buildroot for any Fedora package:2 KB (384 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
- == Packages == I maintain the following packages in Fedora:1 KB (210 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- * start/finish reviews of any new kde4 modules/packages (e.g., kde-l10n, extragear stuff) - DONE * check all packages if defined packages in "Requires" are enough - DONE6 KB (791 words) - 19:19, 3 June 2008
- ...server also mirrors the Fedora Core (and Red Hat Linux) base distribution packages. It does this mostly for users of [https://moin.conectiva.com.br/AptRpm APT |<|1>'''Extra Packages'''||'''extras'''||Additional packages not in the base distribution4 KB (536 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
- As part of this change, we removed support for the X11 session in KDE Plasma packages in Fedora 40. Thus, the KDE SIG created a COPR of those KDE Plasma packages that tracks our packages in Fedora and rebuilds them with the X11 session subpackages automatically:888 bytes (142 words) - 19:13, 29 January 2024
- === Cut-off date for new packages requests in older branches === * FESCo decided the cut-off for new F-(X-2) packages is when F-X goes gold. (For example, new F8 package requests will not be ac1 KB (153 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
- == 5. Searching for Packages with yum == ...n your system. Searches automatically include both installed and available packages.3 KB (528 words) - 01:14, 4 March 2009
- === Orphaned Packages ===899 bytes (116 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
- * I'm mostly interested in java, lisp and audio creation packages for Fedora. ...the packages I help maintain: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/green837 bytes (116 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
- .NET Core and other related packages in the standard Fedora repositories are mainted by the [[SIGs/DotNet|DotNet == References and packages ==2 KB (261 words) - 15:57, 15 May 2024
- I maintain quite a few packages, see the package database for the complete list: * [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/hubbitus?acls=owner Packages owned]2 KB (238 words) - 11:34, 9 May 2017
- ...pypi PyPI] compatible server that we can use to mirror a restricted set of packages and their versions from the root PyPI server. A DevPI server can have multi == Indexes and packages ==3 KB (465 words) - 17:33, 19 March 2015
- === Default commit acl for new packages === * After a long discussion, FESCo approved a proposal the new packages will be created with an default acl that is open to all cvsextras members,1 KB (210 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Fedora Core 7. ...ages, which contain an update to devhelp built against the updated Firefox packages.3 KB (461 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
- Updated firefox packages that fix several security bugs are now available for Users of yelp are advised to upgrade to these erratum packages, which contain3 KB (427 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- Currently all MinGW packages are development packages, and so there is no package/package-devel split. Should we do this or is i ...hen it wouldn't it be better to create -static and -devel pacakges for all packages (like in native version) and put2 KB (235 words) - 19:31, 19 May 2011
- * All packages could use a build test (generally on rawhide if it's not broken) and rpmlin ...esh build test under rawhide anyway as there's plenty of potential for old packages to fail to build in rawhide, especially after things like gcc updates.1 KB (248 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
- * KDE 4 Beta 2 Packages ...mmary of the work done by KevinKofler on the KDE 4 development environment packages:575 bytes (65 words) - 13:37, 28 May 2008
- ...a.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=150222 Blocker bugs] , bugfixes, and packages leading up to gnome 2.14 will be allowed into the tree, however feature imp Packages should be built into the dist-fc5-HEAD collection instance. To move a pack956 bytes (147 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- If two or more packages provide a common set If you have a collection of packages which provide a common set2 KB (248 words) - 18:06, 5 August 2009