Search results

I propose that we add a section to [[Packaging/SourceURL]] that recommends packagers to pick the best source. [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

The packaging guidelines are not clear in explaining why %makeinstall [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

(AFAICT) The intent of the original guideline was to avoid problematic libtool archives[[FootNote(For further reading, se = Current guideline =

Change ["Packaging/GCJGuidelines"] in the following way: [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

Remove the section [[Packaging:Python#Including pyos]] Remove this line from the [[Packaging:Python#Packaging eggs and setuptools concerns| egginfo section]]:

[[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

This is an update to the existing sections in the Packaging/Guidelines. === Packaging Static Libraries ===

http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines

[[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

I propose that the following text be added to the Packaging/Guidelines: ...ask your reviewer. If the reviewer is not sure, they should ask the Fedora Packaging Committee.

Add the following to Packaging/Guidelines [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

Proposal: ammend http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines to allow the maintainer to choose the form of for commit I [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

[[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

...aintained for some time now, and Jindrich Novy is planning to move over to packaging TeXLive as a replacement - see [[Releases/FeatureTexLive]] for details on [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Fedora Packaging Guidelines for Python}} The Fedora Packaging Committee determines the packaging guidelines for Fedora projects. It also approves exemptions the various gu

[[Packaging/Guidelines#Rpmlint_Errors]] [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

...es large amounts of discussion time of packagers, reviewers, people on the packaging commitee and people on fesco w/o any sane result. This is probably the leas ...mandatory part. We assume that packagers do sane things, and there is no guideline to not use "<code>rm -rf /etc</code>", so why should packagers not be handl

{{Admon/tip | This policy has been ratified and added to the Packaging Guidelines}} [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

...w.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-May/msg00116.html, the current Packaging/ScriptletSnippets page contains some incorrect information eg. about what d [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-08-28} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines: