Search results

* [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CPRQ6UJMMADQAUYTHCDKNOROINGOOHRH/ proposed * [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EFTMMXJYAZOW5CHBCON6UHWCUYWF34OY/ Council w

...he file. Experience has shown that this approach is not ideal for handling cases such as IO redirection via the shell, because policy writers cannot usefull ...l data (which is what usually happens after a timeout)" and requested that package maintainers for the programs in the list try to help solve the issue. The F

...Fedora versions. "When I see a package update submitted that just takes a package to the latest upstream release, I always question it in my head (and someti ...a way for users to manually tweak their sound settings for the inevitable cases in which the database lacked (or contained inaccurate) information on speci

...sifex v.0.7.4 for testing on the Fedora staging server, progress on the QA test of Fedora 13's L10n, and an update on Midnight Commander's availability for ...ild to bodhi, please push to testing first, as it will allow your peers to test your update before it makes it into the Fedora 13 tree.

...sion of Bodhi, the freeze of Rawhide and some essential reading on the new package keys. In Developments we shock you with "Non-X System Consoles to be Remove ...Fedora 8 and Fedora 9. "We're in the final stages of testing a few corner cases, and preparing the official builds of fedora-release, PackageKit, gnome-pac

...dora-20/ around 35% of packages] have test suites available as part of the package source code. ...work material for devel, QA and other volunteers and help increase overall test coverage for Fedora!''' Scripts and sample data are available at [https://g

...s after items in the rebuild line are how many other applications use that package. A high count means that it's a good candidate for flatpak-common in the fu ! !! Package !! Flathub ID !! # Reviews !! Avg. Review !! In progress?

...g.cgi?id=441080 441080]||qpidc: $RPM_OPT_FLAGS not used, useless debuginfo package .../bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245387 245387]||broken URL in pam_abl package description