From Fedora Project Wiki
(formatting)
(FESCo approved deprecating nscd in F34, then removing it in F35. Accordingly, a separate new DeprecateNSCD page tracks deprecation in F34; This RemoveNSCD page will now track the F35 removal.)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- The actual name of your proposed change page should look something like: Changes/Your_Change_Proposal_Name.  This keeps all change proposals in the same namespace -->
<!-- The actual name of your proposed change page should look something like: Changes/Your_Change_Proposal_Name.  This keeps all change proposals in the same namespace -->


= Deprecate ''nscd'' <!-- The name of your change proposal --> =
= Remove ''nscd'' <!-- The name of your change proposal --> =


== Summary ==
== Summary ==
Line 7: Line 7:
Note that motivation for the change should be in the Benefit to Fedora section below, and this part should answer the question "What?" rather than "Why?". -->
Note that motivation for the change should be in the Benefit to Fedora section below, and this part should answer the question "What?" rather than "Why?". -->


This proposal intends to deprecate the ''nscd'' cache for named services. Fedora already uses ''systemd-resolved'' by default for caching the `hosts` database, while the ''sssd'' daemon provides caching for the other named services.
This proposal intends to remove the ''nscd'' cache for named services in Fedora 35. nscd is already [[Changes/DeprecateNSCD|planned for deprecation]] in Fedora 34. The functionality it currently provides can be achieved by using ''systemd-resolved'' for DNS caching and the ''sssd'' daemon for everything else.


== Owner ==
== Owner ==
Line 37: Line 37:
<!-- [[Category:SystemWideChange]] -->
<!-- [[Category:SystemWideChange]] -->


* Targeted release: [[Releases/34 | Fedora 34 ]]  
* Targeted release: [[Releases/35 | Fedora 35 ]]  
* Last updated: <!-- this is an automatic macro — you don't need to change this line -->  {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}}  
* Last updated: <!-- this is an automatic macro — you don't need to change this line -->  {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}}  
<!-- After the change proposal is accepted by FESCo, tracking bug is created in Bugzilla and linked to this page  
<!-- After the change proposal is accepted by FESCo, tracking bug is created in Bugzilla and linked to this page  
Line 52: Line 52:
== Detailed Description ==
== Detailed Description ==


''nscd'' is a daemon that provides caching for accesses of the `passwd`, `group`, `hosts`, `services`, and `netgroup` databases through standard libc interfaces (such as `getpwnam`, `getpwuid`, `getgrnam`, `getgrgid`, `gethostbyname`, etc.). This proposal intends to deprecate ''nscd'' in Fedora. nscd has serious technical debt but no real upstream interest in fixing them. Also, currently ''systemd-resolved'' is enabled by default for DNS caching in Fedora, and ''sssd'' is capable of caching the remaining named services that nscd handles. nscd has thus become less relevant. Accordingly, the `nscd` sub-package of glibc will be marked `deprecated()`.
''nscd'' is a daemon that provides caching for accesses of the `passwd`, `group`, `hosts`, `services`, and `netgroup` databases through standard libc interfaces (such as `getpwnam`, `getpwuid`, `getgrnam`, `getgrgid`, `gethostbyname`, etc.). This proposal intends to remove ''nscd'' in Fedora 35 and replace it with functionality provided by ''systemd-resolved'' for the `hosts` database and the ''sssd'' daemon for everything else. Accordingly, the `nscd` sub-package of glibc will be removed in Fedora 35 after being deprecated in Fedora 34.


<!--
<!--
Line 61: Line 61:
== Benefit to Fedora ==
== Benefit to Fedora ==


While still maintained within the glibc source tree, ''nscd'' has received less than forty commits in the past three years and has gathered significant technical debt, and has bugs which are hard to fix.  There are concurrency bugs in the shared mappings, cache unification (IPv4 vs. IPv6 vs. AF_UNSPEC) issues, and more which would require significant investment to fix in nscd.  Such an investment seems unlikely to come upstream, and even if it did, seems like duplicate effort among our communities given the quality and state of ''sssd'', and ''systemd-resolved'' which is already enabled by default from [[Changes/systemd-resolved | Fedora 33 onwards]].
The benefits of this change are [[Changes/DeprecateNSCD#Benefit_to_Fedora|already described]] in the deprecation change proposal.
 
At a high level, sssd and systemd-resolved together provide a caching solution that has feature parity with nscd, with systemd-resolved covering the hosts cache and sssd the rest. The deprecation of nscd from Fedora signals our plan to stop providing is glibc sub-package in a future Fedora release and thus helps:
* move the user base over to a more modern solution for named services caching, and
* reduce maintenance work on the Fedora glibc package and the duplication of effort on nscd upstream.


<!-- What is the benefit to the distribution?  Will the software we generate be improved? How will the process of creating Fedora releases be improved?
<!-- What is the benefit to the distribution?  Will the software we generate be improved? How will the process of creating Fedora releases be improved?
Line 99: Line 95:
<!-- What work do the feature owners have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->
<!-- What work do the feature owners have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->


The volume of work required is minimal, with the only change being the marking of the nscd sub-package offered by glibc with a `Provides: deprecated()` and a comment explaining it in the spec file. Since nscd is not installed by default, even in the future with nscd possibly removed, the affect on the distribution is going to be minimal. Users who have installed nscd in an earlier release of Fedora will not be affected.
The volume of work required is minimal, with the only change being the removal of the nscd sub-package offered by glibc which can be achieved by minor changes to the spec file. Since nscd is not installed by default, the affect on the distribution is minimal. Users who have installed nscd for caching other than DNS in an earlier release of Fedora will need to install and configure sssd instead in order to re-enable caching. For caching DNS queries, Fedora already has systemd-resolved enabled by default since Fedora 33.


* Other developers:
* Other developers:
<!-- What work do other developers have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->
<!-- What work do other developers have to accomplish to complete the feature in time for release?  Is it a large change affecting many parts of the distribution or is it a very isolated change? What are those changes?-->


None.
`nss-pam-ldapd` has a weak dependency on nscd that will need to be removed. `libuser` has a build dependency on nscd that will also need to be removed.
 
In the future, when nscd will (possibly) be removed, two dependent packages will be affected:
`nss-pam-ldapd` has a weak dependency on nscd that will need to be removed. `libuser` has a build dependency on nscd that will also need to be removed. Both changes appear to be easy, only involving a spec file edit.


* Release engineering:
* Release engineering:
Line 125: Line 118:
<!-- Does your proposal align with the current Fedora Objectives: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/objectives/ ? It's okay if it doesn't, but it's something to consider -->
<!-- Does your proposal align with the current Fedora Objectives: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/objectives/ ? It's okay if it doesn't, but it's something to consider -->


While this proposal does not match any of the [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/objectives current objectives], it is not opposed to any.
While this proposal does not directly move any of the currently stated [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/objectives objectives] forward, it is not opposed to any.


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
<!-- What happens to systems that have had a previous versions of Fedora installed and are updated to the version containing this change? Will anything require manual configuration or data migration? Will any existing functionality be no longer supported? -->
<!-- What happens to systems that have had a previous versions of Fedora installed and are updated to the version containing this change? Will anything require manual configuration or data migration? Will any existing functionality be no longer supported? -->
Since the change is purely a deprecation, it will have no upgrade/compatibility impact.
The nscd sub-package depends on a glibc version that is identical to itself. This means that once it is removed and marked as obsolete in Fedora 35, updating from a previous release of Fedora with nscd installed on it, the old nscd package will be uninstalled during the update. Named services caching will cease to function, but the only effect will be slower resolution due to the missing cache. This will be more marked in systems that use remote remote authentication services like LDAP. Functionality will not be affected in any way.
 
<!-- In the future, the removal and marking as obsolete of nscd will however have an upgrade impact:
 
The nscd sub-package depends on a glibc version that is identical to itself. This means that once it is removed and obsoleted in Fedora 34, updating from a previous release of Fedora with nscd installed on it, the old nscd package will be uninstalled during the update. Named services caching will cease to function, but the only effect will be slower resolution due to the missing cache. This will be more marked in systems that use remote remote authentication services like LDAP. Functionality will not be affected in any way.


The hosts cache will automatically be replaced by the one provided by systemd-resolved. However, in order to restore caching functionality for other caches provided by nscd, the system administrator will need to install and/or configure sssd (by enabling sssd with authconfig, and editing `/etc/sssd/sssd.conf` to enable it to work with nss).
The hosts cache will automatically be replaced by the one provided by systemd-resolved. However, in order to restore caching functionality for other caches provided by nscd, the system administrator will need to install and/or configure sssd (by enabling sssd with authconfig, and editing `/etc/sssd/sssd.conf` to enable it to work with nss).
-->


== How To Test ==
== How To Test ==
Line 167: Line 155:
  - Green has been scientifically proven to be the most relaxing color. The move to a default background color of green with green text will result in Fedora users being the most relaxed users of any operating system.
  - Green has been scientifically proven to be the most relaxing color. The move to a default background color of green with green text will result in Fedora users being the most relaxed users of any operating system.
-->
-->
This change will not enforce any change in user experience. However, upon upgrade to Fedora 34, system administrators who want to proactively respond to the deprecation might choose to configure sssd to cache named services if they were using nscd to do so in the past and want to be prepared for its possible removal/obsoletion in a future release.
<!--
In the future, the possible removal of nscd will have the following affect on user experience on upgrade:
* Most users will be unaffected by this change because nscd is not installed by default. It is usually used on systems configured with LDAP, where nscd provides caching of remote queries.
* Most users will be unaffected by this change because nscd is not installed by default. It is usually used on systems configured with LDAP, where nscd provides caching of remote queries.
* On a system using nscd that is updated to Fedora 34 from a previous version, the system administrator will need to install and configure sssd to replace it after the update. Even when this is not done, the only visible affect will be slower resolution of named service queries due to a missing cache.
* On a system using nscd that is updated to Fedora 35 from a previous version, the system administrator will need to install and configure sssd to replace it after the update. Even when this is not done, the only visible affect will be slower resolution of named service queries due to a missing cache.
* Users on a system running sssd and systemd-resolved instead of nscd shouldn't see any noticeable difference in system behaviour or latency in resolving named services.
* Users on a system running sssd and systemd-resolved instead of nscd shouldn't see any noticeable difference in system behaviour or latency in resolving named services.
-->


== Dependencies ==
== Dependencies ==
<!-- What other packages (RPMs) depend on this package?  Are there changes outside the developers' control on which completion of this change depends?  In other words, completion of another change owned by someone else and might cause you to not be able to finish on time or that you would need to coordinate?  Other upstream projects like the kernel (if this is not a kernel change)? -->
<!-- What other packages (RPMs) depend on this package?  Are there changes outside the developers' control on which completion of this change depends?  In other words, completion of another change owned by someone else and might cause you to not be able to finish on time or that you would need to coordinate?  Other upstream projects like the kernel (if this is not a kernel change)? -->


None.
<!--
In future, if nscd is removed:
* `nss-pam-ldapd` has a weak dependency on nscd that will need to be removed.
* `nss-pam-ldapd` has a weak dependency on nscd that will need to be removed.
* `libuser` has a build dependency on nscd that will also need to be removed.
* `libuser` has a build dependency on nscd that will also need to be removed.


Both changes are minimal, requiring a removal of the dependency in the spec file, and a rebuild.
Both changes are minimal, requiring a removal of the dependency in the spec file, and a rebuild.
-->


== Contingency Plan ==
== Contingency Plan ==


<!-- If you cannot complete your feature by the final development freeze, what is the backup plan?  This might be as simple as "Revert the shipped configuration".  Or it might not (e.g. rebuilding a number of dependent packages).  If you feature is not completed in time we want to assure others that other parts of Fedora will not be in jeopardy.  -->
<!-- If you cannot complete your feature by the final development freeze, what is the backup plan?  This might be as simple as "Revert the shipped configuration".  Or it might not (e.g. rebuilding a number of dependent packages).  If you feature is not completed in time we want to assure others that other parts of Fedora will not be in jeopardy.  -->
* Contingency mechanism: Revert changes to glibc spec file and continue to ship nscd as a regularly supported sub-package.
* Contingency mechanism: Revert changes to glibc spec file and continue to ship nscd. Revert changes to libuser and nss-pam-ldapd packages; this will need to be done by the respective package maintainers.


<!-- When is the last time the contingency mechanism can be put in place?  This will typically be the beta freeze. -->
<!-- When is the last time the contingency mechanism can be put in place?  This will typically be the beta freeze. -->
* Contingency deadline: Fedora 34 Beta Freeze
* Contingency deadline: Fedora 35 Beta Freeze
<!-- Does finishing this feature block the release, or can we ship with the feature in incomplete state? -->
<!-- Does finishing this feature block the release, or can we ship with the feature in incomplete state? -->
* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Revision as of 22:56, 6 December 2020


Remove nscd

Summary

This proposal intends to remove the nscd cache for named services in Fedora 35. nscd is already planned for deprecation in Fedora 34. The functionality it currently provides can be achieved by using systemd-resolved for DNS caching and the sssd daemon for everything else.

Owner

Current status

  • Targeted release: Fedora 35
  • Last updated: 2020-12-06
  • FESCo issue: #2501
  • Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
  • Release notes tracker: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>

Detailed Description

nscd is a daemon that provides caching for accesses of the passwd, group, hosts, services, and netgroup databases through standard libc interfaces (such as getpwnam, getpwuid, getgrnam, getgrgid, gethostbyname, etc.). This proposal intends to remove nscd in Fedora 35 and replace it with functionality provided by systemd-resolved for the hosts database and the sssd daemon for everything else. Accordingly, the nscd sub-package of glibc will be removed in Fedora 35 after being deprecated in Fedora 34.


Benefit to Fedora

The benefits of this change are already described in the deprecation change proposal.


Scope

  • Proposal owners:

The volume of work required is minimal, with the only change being the removal of the nscd sub-package offered by glibc which can be achieved by minor changes to the spec file. Since nscd is not installed by default, the affect on the distribution is minimal. Users who have installed nscd for caching other than DNS in an earlier release of Fedora will need to install and configure sssd instead in order to re-enable caching. For caching DNS queries, Fedora already has systemd-resolved enabled by default since Fedora 33.

  • Other developers:

nss-pam-ldapd has a weak dependency on nscd that will need to be removed. libuser has a build dependency on nscd that will also need to be removed.

  • Release engineering:

This change does not require coordination with or have impact on release engineering and does not require a mass rebuild.

  • Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
  • Alignment with Objectives:

While this proposal does not directly move any of the currently stated objectives forward, it is not opposed to any.

Upgrade/compatibility impact

The nscd sub-package depends on a glibc version that is identical to itself. This means that once it is removed and marked as obsolete in Fedora 35, updating from a previous release of Fedora with nscd installed on it, the old nscd package will be uninstalled during the update. Named services caching will cease to function, but the only effect will be slower resolution due to the missing cache. This will be more marked in systems that use remote remote authentication services like LDAP. Functionality will not be affected in any way.

The hosts cache will automatically be replaced by the one provided by systemd-resolved. However, in order to restore caching functionality for other caches provided by nscd, the system administrator will need to install and/or configure sssd (by enabling sssd with authconfig, and editing /etc/sssd/sssd.conf to enable it to work with nss).

How To Test

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

User Experience

  • Most users will be unaffected by this change because nscd is not installed by default. It is usually used on systems configured with LDAP, where nscd provides caching of remote queries.
  • On a system using nscd that is updated to Fedora 35 from a previous version, the system administrator will need to install and configure sssd to replace it after the update. Even when this is not done, the only visible affect will be slower resolution of named service queries due to a missing cache.
  • Users on a system running sssd and systemd-resolved instead of nscd shouldn't see any noticeable difference in system behaviour or latency in resolving named services.

Dependencies

  • nss-pam-ldapd has a weak dependency on nscd that will need to be removed.
  • libuser has a build dependency on nscd that will also need to be removed.

Both changes are minimal, requiring a removal of the dependency in the spec file, and a rebuild.

Contingency Plan

  • Contingency mechanism: Revert changes to glibc spec file and continue to ship nscd. Revert changes to libuser and nss-pam-ldapd packages; this will need to be done by the respective package maintainers.
  • Contingency deadline: Fedora 35 Beta Freeze
  • Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Blocks product? None

Documentation

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Release Notes