From Fedora Project Wiki
(Created page with "<!-- The actual name of your proposed change page should look something like: Changes/Your_Change_Proposal_Name. This keeps all change proposals in the same namespace --> = Remove pam_console = {{Change_Proposal_Banner}} == Summary == Remove pam_console as it's broken and no longer under use. == Owner == * Name: Iker Pedrosa * Email: ipedrosa@redhat.com <!--- UNCOMMENT only for Changes with assigned Shepherd (by FESCo) * FESCo shepherd: User:FAS...")
 
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


== Summary ==
== Summary ==
Remove pam_console as it's broken and no longer under use.
Remove pam_console as it is broken and no longer under use.


== Owner ==
== Owner ==
Line 26: Line 26:
[[Category:SystemWideChange]]
[[Category:SystemWideChange]]


* Targeted release: [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/f<VERSION>/ Fedora Linux <VERSION>]
* Targeted release: [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/f39/ Fedora Linux 39]
* Last updated: <!-- this is an automatic macro — you don't need to change this line -->  {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}}  
* Last updated: <!-- this is an automatic macro — you don't need to change this line -->  {{REVISIONYEAR}}-{{REVISIONMONTH}}-{{REVISIONDAY2}}  
<!-- After the change proposal is accepted by FESCo, tracking bug is created in Bugzilla and linked to this page  
<!-- After the change proposal is accepted by FESCo, tracking bug is created in Bugzilla and linked to this page  
Line 45: Line 45:


== Benefit to Fedora ==
== Benefit to Fedora ==
<!-- What is the benefit to the distribution?  Will the software we generate be improved? How will the process of creating Fedora releases be improved?
The main benefit is that it reduces the maintenance effort of the package, without reducing the functionality as it should be managed by the HAL ACL. The pam_console module is not included in the [https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam Linux-PAM], and it has to be maintained in a [https://pagure.io/pam-redhat side-project]. On top of that, it is just used in Fedora and some of its derivatives.
 
      Be sure to include the following areas if relevant:
      If this is a major capability update, what has changed?
          For example: This change introduces Python 5 that runs without the Global Interpreter Lock and is fully multithreaded.
      If this is a new functionality, what capabilities does it bring?
          For example: This change allows package upgrades to be performed automatically and rolled-back at will.
      Does this improve some specific package or set of packages?
          For example: This change modifies a package to use a different language stack that reduces install size by removing dependencies.
      Does this improve specific Spins or Editions?
          For example: This change modifies the default install of Fedora Workstation to be more in line with the base install of Fedora Server.
      Does this make the distribution more efficient?
          For example: This change replaces thousands of individual %post scriptlets in packages with one script that runs at the end.
      Is this an improvement to maintainer processes?
          For example: Gating Fedora packages on automatic QA tests will make rawhide more stable and allow changes to be implemented more smoothly.
      Is this an improvement targeted as specific contributors?
          For example: Ensuring that a minimal set of tools required for contribution to Fedora are installed by default eases the onboarding of new contributors.
 
    When a Change has multiple benefits, it's better to list them all.
 
    Consider these Change pages from previous editions as inspiration:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Annobin (low-level and technical, invisible to users)
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ParallelInstallableDebuginfo (low-level, but visible to advanced users)
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/VirtualBox_Guest_Integration (primarily a UX change)
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoMoreAlpha (an improvement to distro processes)
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.26 (major upgrade to a popular software stack, visible to users of that stack)
-->
<!-- TODO: the module is not included into the upstream Linux PAM sources, thus it is not maintained by the community.
On top of that, it is just used in Fedora and some of its derivatives.
This should be managed by the HAL ACL -->


== Scope ==
== Scope ==
Line 87: Line 58:
The issue is required to be filed prior to feature submission, to ensure that someone is on board to do any process development work and testing and that all changes make it into the pipeline; a bullet point in a change is not sufficient communication -->
The issue is required to be filed prior to feature submission, to ensure that someone is on board to do any process development work and testing and that all changes make it into the pipeline; a bullet point in a change is not sufficient communication -->


* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change) <!-- REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES -->
* Policies and guidelines: N/A
<!-- Do the packaging guidelines or other documents need to be updated for this feature?  If so, does it need to happen before or after the implementation is done?  If a FPC ticket exists, add a link here. Please submit a pull request with the proposed changes before submitting your Change proposal. -->


* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A
<!-- If your Change may require trademark approval (for example, if it is a new Spin), file a ticket ( https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issues ) requesting trademark approval from the Fedora Council. This approval will be done via the Council's consensus-based process. -->


* Alignment with Objectives:  
* Alignment with Objectives: N/A
<!-- Does your proposal align with the current Fedora Objectives: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/objectives/ ? It's okay if it doesn't, but it's something to consider -->


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==

Revision as of 14:04, 2 January 2023


Remove pam_console

Important.png
This is a proposed Change for Fedora Linux.
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

Summary

Remove pam_console as it is broken and no longer under use.

Owner


Current status

  • Targeted release: Fedora Linux 39
  • Last updated: 2023-01-02
  • FESCo issue: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
  • Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
  • Release notes tracker: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>

Detailed Description

Currently, the pam_console module is broken as one of the files needed to define the permissions (50-default.perms) is not installed in the distribution. Indeed, there was a System-Wide Change proposal in 2007 to remove pam_console, but it wasn't finished.

Feedback

Benefit to Fedora

The main benefit is that it reduces the maintenance effort of the package, without reducing the functionality as it should be managed by the HAL ACL. The pam_console module is not included in the Linux-PAM, and it has to be maintained in a side-project. On top of that, it is just used in Fedora and some of its derivatives.

Scope

  • Proposal owners:
  • Other developers:
  • Policies and guidelines: N/A
  • Trademark approval: N/A
  • Alignment with Objectives: N/A

Upgrade/compatibility impact

How To Test

User Experience

Dependencies

Contingency Plan

  • Contingency mechanism: (What to do? Who will do it?) N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change), Yes/No


Documentation

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Release Notes

Retrieved from "https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes/RemovePamConsole&oldid=664510"