(Mark for review)
(Announcing the Change proposal)
|Line 12:||Line 12:|
== Current status ==
== Current status ==
Revision as of 13:11, 28 July 2021
Restart User Services after Upgrade
User services (services running under systemd user instances) will be restarted as part of the rpm upgrade. This mirrors what is done for system services.
- Name: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
- Email: zbyszek AT in.waw.pl
- Targeted release: Fedora Linux 35
- Last updated: 2021-07-28
- FESCo issue: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
- Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
- Release notes tracker: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
Note: I'm submitting this as very-very-late change for F35. The implementation in systemd is mostly done, so it'll become available in rawhide pretty soon. To actually make use of the new functionality, individual packages should be changed to use
_with_restart in their scriptlets and rebuilt. This will happen over time, and it's fine if each package does that on its own schedule. We still do not have that many user services, and restarting from packaging scriptlets will be possible and appropriate only for some of them. I think it's important to make the functionality available, without trying to use it everywhere immediately.
We have rpm packaging scriptlets to reexecute systemd and restart system services as part of the rpm update transaction. But we didn't have equivalent services for the user manager. With this change, individual system managers will be reexecuted, and various packages can mark their user services to be restarted. The restart of services, similarly to the restart of system services, is done after all packages have been installed, using a transfiletrigger.
Benefit to Fedora
This fixes a long-standing missing feature. We certainly wanted to have this, but the technical implementation is not trivial, because we need to (safely and robustly) reach from the a privileged context into unprivileged user manager instances. Such functionality has been added in systemd, so finally we are able to do this in a fairly clean manner.
User services are becoming more and more important. In particular, we want to be able to restart services such as
pipewire.service during upgrades, without requiring a restart of the machine for the upgrade to take effect. Systemd only provides the general functionality. Package maintainers will need to mark their services for restart using
%systemd_postun_with_restart if appropriate.
- Proposal owners:
- implement appropriate functionality (https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/17967, https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20157, https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20276, https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20334)
- make a pull request to adjust the packaging guidelines (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Scriptlets/#_scriptlets)
- Other developers:
- Switch from
- Make sure that their user services behave properly during restart.
- Switch from
- Release engineering: #Releng issue number
- Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change, all the relevant policies were already in place, but the implementation was missing)
- Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
- Alignment with Objectives: no
This makes upgrades better in general. Various updates can take effect immediately without requiring a restart. There should be no noticeable effect on upgrades, barring bugs.
How To Test
Upgrade packages with user services that should be restarted. Look at logs or otherwise verify that the new version is running.
Updates of user services take effect immediately (if so configured in the providing packages).
Status quo is that various services are not restarted. Actually I don't expect this to be fully implemented at any point in time. If some service need to not be restarted, e.g. because the restart does not work, change
%systemd_user_postun and rebuild the package. If the whole system is broken, the command that actually does the restart in the systemd transfiletrigger can be disabled.
- Contingency deadline: any time
- Blocks release? No.