From Fedora Project Wiki
(Early draft)
 
m (Remove some template cruft)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{admon/important | Comments and Explanations | The page source contains comments providing guidance to fill out each section. They are invisible when viewing this page. To read it, choose the "view source" link.<br/> '''Copy the source to a ''new page'' before making changes!  DO NOT EDIT THIS TEMPLATE FOR YOUR CHANGE PROPOSAL.'''}}
<!-- Self Contained or System Wide Change Proposal?
Use this guide to determine to which category your proposed change belongs to.
Self Contained Changes are:
* changes to isolated/leaf package without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution
* limited scope changes without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution
* coordinated effort within SIG with limited impact outside SIG functional area, accepted by the SIG
System Wide Changes are:
* changes that does not fit Self Contained Changes category touching
* changes that require coordination within the distribution (for example mass rebuilds, release engineering or other teams effort etc.)
* changing system defaults
For Self Contained Changes, sections marked as "REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM WIDE CHANGES" are OPTIONAL but FESCo/Wrangler can request more details (especially in case the change proposal category is improper or updated to System Wide category). For System Wide Changes all fields on this form are required for FESCo acceptance (when applies). 
We request that you maintain the same order of sections so that all of the change proposal pages are uniform.
-->
<!-- The actual name of your proposed change page should look something like: Changes/Your_Change_Proposal_Name.  This keeps all change proposals in the same namespace -->
= Sqlite RpmDB =
= Sqlite RpmDB =


Line 27: Line 5:


== Owner ==
== Owner ==
<!--
For change proposals to qualify as self-contained, owners of all affected packages need to be included here. Alternatively, a SIG can be listed as an owner if it owns all affected packages.
This should link to your home wiki page so we know who you are.
-->
* Name: [[User:pmatilai| Panu Matilainen]] [[User:ffesti|Florian Festi]]
* Name: [[User:pmatilai| Panu Matilainen]] [[User:ffesti|Florian Festi]]
* Email: pmatilai@redhat.com ffesti@redhat.com
* Email: pmatilai@redhat.com ffesti@redhat.com
Line 76: Line 50:


* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
<!-- If your Change may require trademark approval (for example, if it is a new Spin), file a ticket ( https://fedorahosted.org/council/ ) requesting trademark approval from the Fedora Council. This approval will be done via the Council's consensus-based process. -->


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==

Revision as of 07:54, 9 March 2020

Sqlite RpmDB

Summary

Change format of the RPM database from Berkeley DB to a new Sqlite format.

Owner

Current status

  • Targeted release: Fedora 33
  • Last updated: 2020-03-09
  • FESCo issue: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
  • Tracker bug: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>
  • Release notes tracker: <will be assigned by the Wrangler>

Detailed Description

The current rpm database implementation is based on Berkeley DB 5.x, a version which is unmaintained upstream for several years now. Berkeley DB 6.x is license incompatible so moving to that is not an option. In addition, the existing rpmdb implementation is notoriously unreliable as it's not transactional and has no other means to detect inconsistencies either.

Changing to a more sustainable database implementation is long overdue. We propose to change the default rpmdb format to the new sqlite based implementation. Support for current BDB format will be retained in Fedora 33, and phased out to read-only support in Fedora 34.

Benefit to Fedora

  • A far more robust rpm database implementation
  • Getting rid of Berkeley DB dependency in one of the core components

Scope

  • Proposal owners:
  • Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
  • Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)

Upgrade/compatibility impact

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

How To Test

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

User Experience

Dependencies

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Contingency Plan

  • Contingency mechanism:

Revert the default database back to Berkeley DB backend in the package. Running 'rpmdb --rebuilddb' on hosts is currently required to actually convert the database, but means to automate conversion in specific conditions is being discussed upstream.

  • Contingency deadline: Beta freeze
  • Blocks release? Yes

Documentation

N/A (not a System Wide Change)

Release Notes

Retrieved from "https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes/Sqlite_Rpmdb&oldid=567891"