From Fedora Project Wiki

< FWN‎ | Beats

No edit summary
 
(122 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


{{Anchor|Virtualization}}
{{Anchor|Virtualization}}


== Virtualization ==
== Virtualization ==
In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the @et-mgmnt-tools-list, @fedora-xen-list, @libvirt-list and @ovirt-devel-list lists.
In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the
@fedora-virt list.


Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]]
Contributing Writer: [[User:Dale | Dale Bewley]]
=== Enterprise Management Tools List ===
This section contains the discussion happening on the
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools et-mgmt-tools list]
==== Remote virt-manager VM Wizard ====
[[CraigMiskell|Craig Miskell]]
was<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/et-mgmt-tools/2009-June/msg00072.html</ref>
"running {{package|virt-manager}} 0.7.0 on Ubuntu, connecting using SSH to [a remote] {{package|libvirt}} running on Debian Lenny Xen-3.2.1", and when attempting to create a new guest found "no install options are available because:"
* "Network install" is not available unless the connection is local, and
* Local install media and Network boot (PXE) are not available because of the following line in create.py (around line 340):
is_pv = (self.capsguest.os_type == "xen")
[[ColeRobinson|Cole Robinson]] pointed out the latter has been fixed upstream,
and explained the former fails "Because a network install has to fetch a boot kernel and initrd from the URL, and we have no way to tell the remote machine to fetch these locations."
<references />


=== Fedora Virtualization List ===
=== Fedora Virtualization List ===
Line 31: Line 14:
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list].
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt fedora-virt list].


==== F12 Feature: Host Information ====
==== Virt Status Report ====
[[RichardJones|Richard Jones]]
[[JustinForbes|Justin Forbes]]
posted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-June/msg00123.html</ref>
posted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00056.html</ref> a Fedora virtualization status report.
an RFC for a feature<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Hostinfo</ref> he's working on for [[Releases/12|Fedora 12]]. 
Justin pointed out F13 bugs<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_bugs</ref> now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target.
The feature will "Allow a virtual machine to see information and statistics from the
host operating system."
 
For example, it will "Allow a virtual machine to look at host information (such as number of
physical, not just virtual CPUs), and statistics like the load on the
host."
 
[[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]]
noted<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-June/msg00130.html</ref>
that "a core goal of this
hostinfo service is to avoid any use of networking. We don't want to
presume that a guest has a NIC, nor that the host has a configured
NIC on the same LAN as the guest." So this feature will make use of serial
ports to pass queries and responses between the guest and the host.


<references />
<references />


==== libguestfs Super-minimized Appliance ====
==== RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity ====
[[RichardJones|Richard Jones]]
Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features<ref>http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/</ref> of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4
created<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-June/msg00118.html</ref>
compared to Fedora 12.
a set of "very experimental" patches to {{package|libguestfs}}
"which allow you to build a so-called 'supermin (super-minimized) appliance'."


Within <code>libguestfs</code>, "The normal appliance is a self-contained Linux operating system, based
[[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]]
on the Fedora/RHEL/CentOS Linux distro. So it contains a complete
explained<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-December/msg00040.html</ref>
copy of all the libraries and programs needed, like kernel, libc,
"The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind
bash, coreutils etc etc."
Fedora as you might think. The {{package|libvirt}} mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was
 
rebased to be near parity with [[Releases/11|Fedora 11]], and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is
"The supermin appliance removes the kernel and all the executable
also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of
libraries and programs from the appliance. That just leaves a
kvm-83 and kvm-84."
skeleton of config files and some data files, which is obviously
massively smaller than the normal appliance.  At runtime we rebuild
the appliance on-the-fly from the libraries and programs on the host
(eg. pulling in the real /lib/libc.so, the real /bin/bash etc.)"
 
"The new appliance is a mere 500K, so <code>libguestfs</code> RPMs will be a lot
smaller.  Of course that just means they will have many more
dependencies, so the amount pulled down will be the same or greater."


<references />
<references />


==== A guest fish in the pipes ====
[[RichardJones|Richard Jones]]
patched<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-virt/2009-June/msg00177.html</ref>
{{package|libguestfs|guestfish}}. "This patch adds support for pipes to guestfish, so you can pipe output
from a <code>guestfish</code> command through a command on the host.  The canonical
example is:
><fs> hexdump /bin/ls | less
Another example, looking for root backdoors in the password file:
><fs> cat /etc/passwd | awk -F: '$3 == 0 { print }' | grep -v ^root:
Anything right of the first pipe symbol gets passed to the local
shell, thus expansion, redirection and so on work on that."
<references />
=== Libvirt List ===
This section contains the discussion happening on the
[http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list libvir-list].
==== Safe PCI Device Passthrough ====
[[MirkoRaasch|Mirko Raasch]]
asked<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-June/msg00516.html</ref>
"How can i start my guest with three pci devices passed through and {{package|libvirt}}?" Starting <code>qemu</code> by hand appeared to work.
But virsh start produced an error:
<pre>
libvirtd: 15:44:55.459: warning : pciTrySecondaryBusReset:483 : Other
devices on bus with 0000:05:01.0, not doing bus reset
</pre>
[[DanielBerrange|Daniel Berrange]]
recalled<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-June/msg00518.html</ref>
"what <code>libvirt</code> is complaining about is that there are other devices
in the PCI bus which are not associated with this guest, and thus there
is no way to safely reset the device you are trying to assign, without
endangering the host OS or other guest OS."
Adding "when you launch QEMU manually there is no
checking for whether the PCI devices are in use by other guests,
or by the host OS. So while it may launch QEMU, it is not running
safely, and eg, if your guest  OS does a PCI bus reset it could
kill/harm your host OS."
PCI device passthrough is a new feature<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/KVM_PCI_Device_Assignment</ref> in Fedora 11.


====  ====
<references />
<references />


==== VMware ESX driver status update ====
==== ====
[[MatthiasBolte|Matthias Bolte]]
continued<ref>http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2009-June/msg00469.html</ref> work (FWN #177<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue177#Libvirt_VMWare_ESX_Driver_In_Development</ref>) to create a VMware ESX driver for <code>libvirt</code>.
 
Matthias is currently "working on the VMX config to domain XML mapping for
dump/create XML" using the VMware Infrastructure API<ref>http://www.vmware.com/support/developer/vc-sdk/visdk25pubs/ReferenceGuide/</ref>.
 
<references />
<references />

Latest revision as of 18:09, 18 December 2009



Virtualization

In this section, we cover discussion of Fedora virtualization technologies on the @fedora-virt list.

Contributing Writer: Dale Bewley

Fedora Virtualization List

This section contains the discussion happening on the fedora-virt list.

Virt Status Report

Justin Forbes posted[1] a Fedora virtualization status report. Justin pointed out F13 bugs[2] now include Important and Pony classifications in addition to Blocker and Target.

RHEL and Fedora Virtualization Feature Parity

Robert Day wondered how the virtualization features[1] of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 compared to Fedora 12.

Daniel Berrange explained[2] "The KVM based virtualization in RHEL-5.4 is not nearly so far behind Fedora as you might think. The Package-x-generic-16.pnglibvirt mgmt stack in RHEL-5.4 was rebased to be near parity with Fedora 11, and KVM in RHEL-5.4 is also pretty close to that using what's best described as a hybrid of kvm-83 and kvm-84."