(stub 172 for Announcements,Artwork,Development,SecurityWeek,SecurityAdvisories) |
(→Fedora Weekly News Issue 172: add Erratum) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue172 | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue172 | ||
This week Announcements rubs its hands with glee over the "Fedora 11" freeze. Similarly Artwork enthuses about "Fedora 11 Landing" with great Leonidas themes including a surprise for wide-screen setups. Developments gushes about "Presto and DeltaRPM Status" and SecurityWeek asks the interesting question "Who in the Linux World Would be Responsible for a Worm?". SecurityAdvisories faithfully lists updates that might just help avoid that worm. | This week Announcements rubs its hands with glee over the "Fedora 11" freeze. Similarly Artwork enthuses about "Fedora 11 Landing" with great Leonidas themes including a surprise for wide-screen setups. Developments gushes about "Presto and DeltaRPM Status" and SecurityWeek asks the interesting question "Who in the Linux World Would be Responsible for a Worm?". SecurityAdvisories faithfully lists updates that might just help avoid that worm. With a red face we draw your attention with an Erratum to last week's missing QualityAssurance beat. | ||
If you are interested in contributing to Fedora Weekly News, please see our 'join' page<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NewsProject/Join</ref>. We welcome reader feedback: fedora-news-list@redhat.com | If you are interested in contributing to Fedora Weekly News, please see our 'join' page<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/NewsProject/Join</ref>. We welcome reader feedback: fedora-news-list@redhat.com | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
FWN Editorial Team: [[User:Pcalarco|Pascal Calarco]], [[User:Ush|Oisin Feeley]], [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]] | FWN Editorial Team: [[User:Pcalarco|Pascal Calarco]], [[User:Ush|Oisin Feeley]], [[HuzaifaSidhpurwala|Huzaifa Sidhpurwala]] | ||
=== Erratum: Missing QualityAssurance Beat in FWN#171 === | |||
Last week (FWN#171) your painstaking QualityAssurance correspondent, [[User:Adamwill|Adam Williamson]], wrote a very readable account of the activity around the UEFI BIOS replacement, Graphics-card Metrics and a lot more. Somehow we omitted to include this in the plaintext issue. With apologies to Adam and to our readers we suggest you take a look at our archived web version<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue171#QualityAssurance</ref>. | |||
<references/> | |||
Revision as of 02:23, 20 April 2009
Fedora Weekly News Issue 172
Welcome to Fedora Weekly News Issue 172 for the week ending April 19th, 2009.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue172
This week Announcements rubs its hands with glee over the "Fedora 11" freeze. Similarly Artwork enthuses about "Fedora 11 Landing" with great Leonidas themes including a surprise for wide-screen setups. Developments gushes about "Presto and DeltaRPM Status" and SecurityWeek asks the interesting question "Who in the Linux World Would be Responsible for a Worm?". SecurityAdvisories faithfully lists updates that might just help avoid that worm. With a red face we draw your attention with an Erratum to last week's missing QualityAssurance beat.
If you are interested in contributing to Fedora Weekly News, please see our 'join' page[1]. We welcome reader feedback: fedora-news-list@redhat.com
FWN Editorial Team: Pascal Calarco, Oisin Feeley, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
Erratum: Missing QualityAssurance Beat in FWN#171
Last week (FWN#171) your painstaking QualityAssurance correspondent, Adam Williamson, wrote a very readable account of the activity around the UEFI BIOS replacement, Graphics-card Metrics and a lot more. Somehow we omitted to include this in the plaintext issue. With apologies to Adam and to our readers we suggest you take a look at our archived web version[1].