|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{header|marketing}} | | {{header|marketing}} |
|
| |
|
| =SWOT analysis= | | = Introduction = |
| See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWOT_analysis
| |
|
| |
|
| == Introduction == | | = SWOT Analysis = |
| Small and brief introduction about the document.
| |
|
| |
|
| == Internal == | | == Internal Environment == |
| This is to be faced as a "audit" to Fedora Project. Here we are going to perform a self assessment of Fedora's strength's and weaknesses. The elements to be present all need to be controllable by the management. I would propose the following line for Fedora (5M method):
| |
| * Men
| |
| * Means
| |
| * Method's
| |
| * Measurables
| |
| * Machines
| |
|
| |
|
| I would like to place an emphasis on the following:
| | === Strengths === |
| * Quality and Management
| |
| * Performance / Performance improvements
| |
| * Technology
| |
|
| |
|
| === Strength's === | | === Weaknesses === |
|
| |
|
| === Weaknesses === | | === Critical Factors for Success === |
|
| |
|
| == External == | | == External Analysis == |
| Here should like the Opportunities and Threats that Fedora faces in the market. Keep in mind that many of this topics are uncontrollable by Fedora's management. Here we should list the opportunities and threats that our "product" faces. I would once more maybe suggest the STEEP methodology:
| |
| * Socio-cultural factors
| |
| * Technological factors (barriers)
| |
| * Economic factors
| |
| * Environmental factors
| |
| * Political factors (ie. cryptographic export laws).
| |
|
| |
|
| === Opportunities === | | === Opportunities === |
| Line 36: |
Line 19: |
| === Threats === | | === Threats === |
|
| |
|
| == SWOT Matrix == | | === Comparative Analysis === |
| Swot Matrix goes here...
| |
|
| |
|
| == Conclusion == | | == Analysis and Proposals for Action == |
| Final review and conclusion goes here. To be defined how to handle this. For later review through the Marketing list.
| |
