From Fedora Project Wiki
Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-10-02}
Present
- DavidLutterkort (
lutter) - JasonTibbitts (
tibbs) - JesseKeating (
f13) - RexDieter (
rdieter) - TomCallaway (
spot) - ToshioKuratomi (
abadger1999) - VilleSkyttä (
scop)
Writeups
The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
Votes
The following proposals were considered:
- Naming of TeX-related packages:
- http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-September/msg00066.html
- Accepted (5 - 0)
- Voting for: tibbs scop f13 abadger1999 (all on-list) rdieter (on IRC)
- Voting against: (none)
Other Discussions
As the FPC has worked through its backlog of proposed guidelines, the committee will now begin meeting every other week unless circumstances warrant otherwise.
The next meeting will be on 2007-10-16T17:00Z, October 16 17:00UTC.
IRC Logs
12:05 <tibbs> So, FPC meeting? [12:05] * spot is here [12:06] <rdieter> here [12:07] * spot counts 4 heads [12:07] <scop> well, for example fontforge upstream applied my patch, but also made it try firefox *before* xdg-open :P [12:07] <tibbs> Well, the Eggos proposal was approved by FESCo. [12:07] <rdieter> abadger1999, f13, lutter? [12:08] <abadger1999> Hey [12:08] <rdieter> 5! [12:08] <spot> f13 might still be at lunch. we were in a shared meeting before this that ran long [12:08] <spot> ok, thats 5. [12:09] <spot> i have nothing for today's agenda, other than to note that the tex naming scheme passed vote on the mailing list [12:09] <f13> I'm here. [12:09] <tibbs> There was one +1 vote last week on IRC from Rex, but we didn't want to push that to FESCo without your assent. [12:09] * spot nods [12:10] <spot> lets go ahead and push it to FESCo [12:10] <lutter> rdieter: present [12:10] <tibbs> Is there a proposal in the wiki or should I just link to the original mailing list post? [12:11] <spot> linking to the post is fine. [12:12] <spot> ok, are there any other items for discussion today? (if not, please say no) [12:12] <tibbs> Nothing from me. [12:12] <f13> no [12:12] <rdieter> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/315221 , just quick-n-dirty comment. [12:12] <abadger1999> nothing here [12:12] <tibbs> Honestly our job has mostly wound down; perhaps we should consider meeting less often. [12:13] <scop> tibbs++ [12:13] <spot> sure. [12:13] <spot> lets move to biweekly [12:13] <rdieter> biweekly +1 [12:13] <scop> works for me [12:14] <abadger1999> rdieter: I'd +1 Bug # 315221 that but will that help? We've already voted on it once.... [12:14] <rdieter> this Name/GenericName thing is drawing out, without much/any comment/movement from gnome-desktop folks. [12:14] <abadger1999> biweekly is fine. [12:14] <tibbs> +1 but we should keep the option to meet more often if necessary. [12:14] <spot> sure. [12:14] <rdieter> abadger1999: *shrug*, I don't know what else to do. [12:14] <lutter> biweekly sounds good [12:15] <spot> i think the Name/GenericName is something that we'll have to sit down and tackle at a FUDCon [12:15] <spot> with the gnome desktop folks [12:15] <rdieter> other than being a prick and forcing their hand in f-9 timeframe via FESCO or wild .desktop names in kde spin to make sh*t happen. [12:16] <rdieter> spot: you're probably right. [12:16] <rdieter> ok, that's all afaic. [12:16] <spot> ok, i think thats it for today then. [12:17] <spot> thanks everyone. :) [12:17] <tibbs> So the next meeting is in two weeks, correct? [12:17] <spot> yes. [12:18] <f13> yay [12:18] <tibbs> October 16 it is. [12:18] <f13> (cause I would have missed next week)