From Fedora Project Wiki
No edit summary |
(update page with the results of the meeting) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Attendees = | = Attendees = | ||
* adamw (231) | |||
* VICODAN (105) | |||
* tflink (78) | |||
* j_dulaney (52) | |||
* kparal (47) | |||
* brunowolff (27) | |||
* Viking-Ice (8) | |||
* zodbot (6) | |||
* Southern_Gentlem (4) | |||
* jskladan (3) | |||
* pjones (2) | |||
* ianweller (1) | |||
* mkrizek (1) | |||
* satellit_ (1) | |||
* rbergeron (1) | |||
* j_dulaney1 (1) | |||
= Agenda = | = Agenda = | ||
| Line 11: | Line 27: | ||
== Previous meeting follow-up == | == Previous meeting follow-up == | ||
* kparal to propose revised criteria to cover split installs (installer sourced from one repo, packages from internet repos) | * kparal to propose revised criteria to cover split installs (installer sourced from one repo, packages from internet repos): didn't have a chance to do this yet | ||
* wwoods to ensure anaconda docs are updated to reflect what repo= is supposed to be capable of | * wwoods to ensure anaconda docs are updated to reflect what repo= is supposed to be capable of: wwoods was not around to update this | ||
== Fedora 17 Beta status / blocker review == | == Fedora 17 Beta status / blocker review == | ||
* [[ | * We still haven't been able to spin an RC3 | ||
* | * We have pretty good RC2 test coverage, just a couple of tests remain, we can knock those off today | ||
=== Blocker review === | |||
* AGREED: more information needed on [[rhbug:807510|#807510]] to reach a determination of blocker status, tflink will test with his similar hardware | |||
* AGREED: [[rhbug:808029|#808029]] is accepted as a beta blocker per the criteria as they stand; criteria modification proposal is pending but needs further discussion in light of the virt-install use case | |||
* AGREED: [[rhbug:808378|#808378]] is accepted as NTH because 3.4 fixes several known bugs and we obviously would prefer testing of final to testing of an obsolete beta | |||
* AGREED: [[rhbug:809052|#809052]] is a blocker per the virtualization and 'installed system should boot to working desktop' criteria, for the sufficiently common case of VM using cirrus as the graphics driver | |||
== 'Project' status == | == 'Project' status == | ||
* See the [ | * See the [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2012-March/106215.html on-list discussion] | ||
* We're happy for QA to officially become a 'Fedora project', we will stick the drafted Governance section into the Wiki somewhere and let the board know we're happy to accept project status. This decision does not in any way influence the question of the QA/Bugzappers relationship | |||
== Test Day report == | == Test Day report == | ||
* [[Test_Day:2012-03-27_Kdump|Kdump Test Day on 03-27]] | * [[Test_Day:2012-03-27_Kdump|Kdump Test Day on 03-27]] seems to have been DOA, likely due to late organization and lack of publicity | ||
* [[Test_Day:2012-03-29_Gnome_Shell_Software_Rendering|GNOME Shell software rendering Test Day on 03-29]] | * [[Test_Day:2012-03-29_Gnome_Shell_Software_Rendering|GNOME Shell software rendering Test Day on 03-29]] seems to have gone off pretty nicely, decent amount of testing and some useful reports | ||
== Upcoming QA events == | == Upcoming QA events == | ||
| Line 31: | Line 54: | ||
== AutoQA update == | == AutoQA update == | ||
* No news, team is busy with Beta testing | |||
== Open floor == | == Open floor == | ||
== IRC Log == | == IRC Log == | ||
Revision as of 07:50, 4 April 2012
Attendees
- adamw (231)
- VICODAN (105)
- tflink (78)
- j_dulaney (52)
- kparal (47)
- brunowolff (27)
- Viking-Ice (8)
- zodbot (6)
- Southern_Gentlem (4)
- jskladan (3)
- pjones (2)
- ianweller (1)
- mkrizek (1)
- satellit_ (1)
- rbergeron (1)
- j_dulaney1 (1)
Agenda
- Previous meeting follow-up
- Fedora 17 Beta status / blocker review
- 'Project' status
- Test Day report
- Upcoming QA events
- AutoQA update
- Open floor
Previous meeting follow-up
- kparal to propose revised criteria to cover split installs (installer sourced from one repo, packages from internet repos): didn't have a chance to do this yet
- wwoods to ensure anaconda docs are updated to reflect what repo= is supposed to be capable of: wwoods was not around to update this
Fedora 17 Beta status / blocker review
- We still haven't been able to spin an RC3
- We have pretty good RC2 test coverage, just a couple of tests remain, we can knock those off today
Blocker review
- AGREED: more information needed on #807510 to reach a determination of blocker status, tflink will test with his similar hardware
- AGREED: #808029 is accepted as a beta blocker per the criteria as they stand; criteria modification proposal is pending but needs further discussion in light of the virt-install use case
- AGREED: #808378 is accepted as NTH because 3.4 fixes several known bugs and we obviously would prefer testing of final to testing of an obsolete beta
- AGREED: #809052 is a blocker per the virtualization and 'installed system should boot to working desktop' criteria, for the sufficiently common case of VM using cirrus as the graphics driver
'Project' status
- See the on-list discussion
- We're happy for QA to officially become a 'Fedora project', we will stick the drafted Governance section into the Wiki somewhere and let the board know we're happy to accept project status. This decision does not in any way influence the question of the QA/Bugzappers relationship
Test Day report
- Kdump Test Day on 03-27 seems to have been DOA, likely due to late organization and lack of publicity
- GNOME Shell software rendering Test Day on 03-29 seems to have gone off pretty nicely, decent amount of testing and some useful reports
Upcoming QA events
- Power Management Test Day on 04-04
- Installation l10n/i18n Test Day on 04-05
- Beta Go/No-Go scheduled (again) for 04-04
AutoQA update
- No news, team is busy with Beta testing