From Fedora Project Wiki

(pose a question regarding the test case.)
 
m (Added comment)
Line 1: Line 1:
Why kickstart with @base?  Why couldn't you just do %packages --nobase ?  That would allow kickstart to more closely match what one would do via the gui.
Why kickstart with @base?  Why couldn't you just do %packages --nobase ?  That would allow kickstart to more closely match what one would do via the gui.
* [[User:jlaska]]: Good question ... there's a different experience when deselecting all package groups but Base, and deselecting all package groups.  Historically, we've gone with @base so that the installed system had a sufficient set of tools available for boot strapping the next test.  Will that be the case with "%packages --nobase" ?

Revision as of 15:51, 23 September 2008

Why kickstart with @base? Why couldn't you just do %packages --nobase ? That would allow kickstart to more closely match what one would do via the gui.


  • User:jlaska: Good question ... there's a different experience when deselecting all package groups but Base, and deselecting all package groups. Historically, we've gone with @base so that the installed system had a sufficient set of tools available for boot strapping the next test. Will that be the case with "%packages --nobase" ?