Shipping fonts in Fedora (FAQ): Revision history

23 February 2009

• curprev 09:3609:36, 23 February 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ m 23,685 bytes +110‎ No edit summary

21 February 2009

• curprev 18:0618:06, 21 February 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 23,575 bytes −7,380‎ No edit summary

20 February 2009

• curprev 10:2710:27, 20 February 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 30,955 bytes +258‎ upgrade path checks
• curprev 10:2410:24, 20 February 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ m 30,697 bytes +1‎ →‎What if the new naming guidelines require me to rename my source package?
• curprev 10:2310:23, 20 February 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 30,696 bytes +80‎ complete instructions

14 February 2009

• curprev 21:3421:34, 14 February 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 30,616 bytes +580‎ Can I re-indent/re-order the fonts packaging template?
• curprev 11:1911:19, 14 February 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ m 30,036 bytes −344‎ Obsolete
• curprev 11:1811:18, 14 February 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 30,380 bytes +338‎ small additions and fixes

31 January 2009

• curprev 10:1510:15, 31 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 30,042 bytes −4‎ →‎What fontconfig generic family should I put my font in?
• curprev 10:1510:15, 31 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 30,046 bytes −11‎ →‎What fontconfig generic family should I put my font in?
• curprev 10:1510:15, 31 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 30,057 bytes −83‎ →‎What fontconfig generic family should I put my font in?

29 January 2009

• curprev 22:2722:27, 29 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 30,140 bytes +7‎ →‎What fontconfig generic family should I put my font in?
• curprev 22:0522:05, 29 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 30,133 bytes +2‎ →‎The fontconfig stuff the font guidelines suggest seems complex. Can I skip it?
• curprev 21:5421:54, 29 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 30,131 bytes +298‎ →‎What fontconfig generic family should I put my font in?
• curprev 21:4921:49, 29 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 29,833 bytes +214‎ →‎How can I check if my upgrade path work?

25 January 2009

• curprev 16:5716:57, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 29,619 bytes +488‎ No edit summary
• curprev 16:4416:44, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 29,131 bytes −3‎ No edit summary
• curprev 16:4316:43, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 29,134 bytes +34‎ No edit summary
• curprev 16:4216:42, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 29,100 bytes +62‎ →‎What's the point of the common subpackage?
• curprev 16:4016:40, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 29,038 bytes +115‎ No edit summary
• curprev 16:3716:37, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 28,923 bytes +4‎ →‎The fontconfig stuff the font guidelines suggest seems complex. Can I skip it?
• curprev 16:3616:36, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 28,919 bytes +1,022‎ No edit summary
• curprev 16:1616:16, 25 January 2009‎ Ianweller talk contribs‎ m 27,897 bytes +1‎ →‎The fontconfig stuff the font guidelines suggest seems complex. Can I avoid it?: add space after period
• curprev 16:1216:12, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 27,896 bytes +92‎ →‎The fontconfig stuff the font guidelines suggest seems complex. Can I avoid it?
• curprev 16:0916:09, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ m 27,804 bytes +102‎ →‎How many font files can I put in a font (sub)package?
• curprev 16:0816:08, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 27,702 bytes +9‎ →‎What is a font file?
• curprev 15:3115:31, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ m 27,693 bytes +14‎ →‎How can I check if my upgrade path work?
• curprev 15:3015:30, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 27,679 bytes +3‎ →‎How can I check if my upgrade path work?
• curprev 15:2915:29, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 27,676 bytes +722‎ add more testing
• curprev 15:1815:18, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ m 26,954 bytes +95‎ →‎Do I need to Provide my old package names?
• curprev 15:1615:16, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ m 26,859 bytes +2‎ No edit summary
• curprev 13:5913:59, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 26,857 bytes +6‎ →‎The %_font_pkg is forcing choices on me!
• curprev 13:5913:59, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 26,851 bytes +2‎ No edit summary
• curprev 13:4513:45, 25 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 26,849 bytes +4,116‎ add obsolete/provides/test info

24 January 2009

• curprev 18:2318:23, 24 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 22,733 bytes +46‎ No edit summary

22 January 2009

• curprev 20:4520:45, 22 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 22,687 bytes +77‎ Link to final published fonts guidelines

19 January 2009

• curprev 19:2719:27, 19 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 22,610 bytes +1‎ →‎Why is the common subpackage in the multi-font-families templates named foo-fonts-common and not foo-common-fonts?
• curprev 19:2519:25, 19 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 22,609 bytes +547‎ No edit summary
• curprev 06:5006:50, 19 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 22,062 bytes +1‎ No edit summary
• curprev 06:4906:49, 19 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 22,061 bytes +128‎ No edit summary

18 January 2009

• curprev 20:4620:46, 18 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 21,933 bytes +155‎ No edit summary
• curprev 19:0019:00, 18 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 21,778 bytes +218‎ No edit summary

17 January 2009

• curprev 14:0714:07, 17 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 21,560 bytes +88‎ No edit summary
• curprev 12:2212:22, 17 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 21,472 bytes +32‎ No edit summary
• curprev 10:4710:47, 17 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 21,440 bytes −2‎ →‎What font packaging changes are needed with post-1.13 fontpackages ?
• curprev 10:4610:46, 17 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 21,442 bytes −4‎ →‎What font packaging changes are needed with post-1.13 fontpackages ?
• curprev 10:4510:45, 17 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 21,446 bytes −2‎ →‎Why all naming churn, font packages got renamed twice?
• curprev 10:3710:37, 17 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 21,448 bytes +11‎ →‎Why were Provides for the old package names not added during naming changes?
• curprev 10:3610:36, 17 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 21,437 bytes +4‎ →‎Why were provides for the old package names not added during naming changes?
• curprev 10:3410:34, 17 January 2009‎ Nim talk contribs‎ 21,433 bytes −3‎ →‎Why were provides for the old package names not added during naming changes?