From Fedora Project Wiki

Page title matches

  • A place to group archived packaging guideline drafts to make them easier to find collectively as well as to follow [[Help:Wiki S [[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]]
    81 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 14:17, 21 February 2009

Page text matches

  • A place to group archived packaging guideline drafts to make them easier to find collectively as well as to follow [[Help:Wiki S [[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]]
    81 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 14:17, 21 February 2009
  • = Existing Guideline = No guideline that would limit the use of Epochs exists.
    1 KB (207 words) - 21:50, 17 February 2009
  • = Existing Guideline = = New Guideline =
    2 KB (273 words) - 00:59, 6 August 2009
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-08-28} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    7 KB (978 words) - 03:22, 21 December 2008
  • [[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]] = Existing Guideline =
    1 KB (139 words) - 18:03, 13 October 2011
  • The Fedora Packaging Committee determines the packaging guidelines for Fedora projects. It also approves exemptions the various gu The Fedora Packaging Committee currently meets every Thursday at 17:00 UTC (16:00 UTC during US
    6 KB (919 words) - 19:46, 2 May 2024
  • ...ready for FPC review ||added || This is the tasks for review team? Yep. Drafts for the FPC to review |[[PackagingDrafts/ExplicitRequires]]|| Explicit Requires packaging guideline modifications || added || In progress
    20 KB (2,423 words) - 18:54, 27 February 2009
  • == Things to be considered for Packaging Guidelines == |JavaScript||abadger1999|| Discuss||[[JavaScript libraries packaging guideline draft]] Libraries Packaged. See discussion page for Unresolved Issues
    4 KB (589 words) - 21:35, 6 January 2016
  • This is a Guideline change that would be good to fix old packages. The way to detect what pack [[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]]
    2 KB (311 words) - 14:06, 31 August 2009
  • = GNUstep Packaging Overview = This section documents the various GNUstep packaging layouts. The current Fedora layout is contrasted to that used by other dist
    5 KB (758 words) - 02:16, 25 February 2009
  • == Existing guideline == Following change to Packaging Guidelines is proposed: Add a section '''Use of alternatives''' which would
    6 KB (791 words) - 17:55, 14 April 2009
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-09-04} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    11 KB (1,689 words) - 03:22, 21 December 2008
  • == Existing Guideline == [[Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf]]
    8 KB (1,201 words) - 17:16, 12 June 2009
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-04-22} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    21 KB (3,020 words) - 03:24, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-06-12} === [12:09] <thimm> Maybe shorten to what the guideline is and then explain in further paragraphs?
    13 KB (1,802 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2008-08-26 === * Approved the draft Haskell packaging guidelines: [[PackagingDrafts/Haskell]]
    53 KB (6,993 words) - 03:19, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - 2008-10-21 === * Eclipse plugin guideline modification
    39 KB (4,928 words) - 03:20, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-02-03 === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    38 KB (4,928 words) - 19:15, 5 February 2009
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-06-19} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    15 KB (2,155 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of 2007.04.17 === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCo and are to be written into
    19 KB (2,703 words) - 03:21, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-01-06 === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    29 KB (3,755 words) - 19:08, 6 January 2009
  • [[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]] = Packaging of add-ons for GNU Emacs and XEmacs =
    20 KB (3,080 words) - 22:24, 10 December 2011
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-03-25} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    35 KB (5,228 words) - 03:24, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-01-20 === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    50 KB (6,258 words) - 19:40, 20 January 2009
  • ...se a particular implementation that works best for them at run time. This guideline gives a structure that can enforce the first while allowing the second, as == Packaging BLAS/LAPACK dependent packages ==
    7 KB (986 words) - 17:31, 18 January 2022
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007.03.20} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into
    33 KB (4,946 words) - 03:20, 21 December 2008
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-03-31 === * Wordpress Plugin Packaging
    51 KB (6,665 words) - 02:57, 3 April 2009
  • = Existing Guideline = Motivations for changing the existing guideline:
    15 KB (1,697 words) - 13:26, 12 May 2009
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-04-01} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    30 KB (4,375 words) - 03:24, 21 December 2008
  • = Packaging Eclipse Plugins = ...g guideline applies to Fedora 17+. Please consult [[OldPackagingLink]] for packaging guidelines for older Fedora versions. }}
    12 KB (1,709 words) - 19:25, 14 October 2016
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-05-20} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    43 KB (5,821 words) - 03:24, 21 December 2008
  • ====[Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines==== <ref>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript#Careful_Handling_of_.2Fvar.2Flock.2Fsubsys.2F.3Cservice_name
    17 KB (2,484 words) - 11:18, 31 August 2012
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007.03.13} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    45 KB (6,749 words) - 03:20, 21 December 2008
  • === Packaging Committee Report === ...e to the pkgconfig guidelines: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging Drafts/pkgconfig
    28 KB (4,030 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • .... Noting his C/Qt experience KevinKofler suggested [2] helping with KDE4 packaging. OttoRey was led to wonder [3] whether there were clear mini-RFCs or oth === DELL firmware packaging Saga Continues. A Bug Gets Squished In rpmUtils.updates.py ===
    32 KB (4,663 words) - 10:23, 14 April 2009
  • ...e documentation team and live in the general Fedora wiki instead of in the Packaging Guidelines. [[SysVinit to Systemd Cheatsheet]] started for this purpose. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Initscripts
    17 KB (2,619 words) - 18:04, 23 February 2011
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-04-08} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:
    41 KB (6,186 words) - 03:24, 21 December 2008
  • ...guidelines exists. If you're packaging for EPEL 5 you should follow the [[Packaging:Old_Ruby | old ruby guidelines]] instead.}} ...id not work. Please see this [[https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Ruby&oldid=363159 earlier version of the guidelines]] if you want your pack
    25 KB (3,835 words) - 19:33, 14 October 2016
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-04-28 === | style="color: #42427e" | I do wish we could keep these drafts a bit cleaner. I can't really understand from this draft what is being pro
    34 KB (4,289 words) - 00:02, 12 May 2009
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-02-17 === ** Somehow during the wiki conversion a guideline page was created that redirected too a draft page. This was in error; FPC
    73 KB (9,339 words) - 15:21, 28 April 2017
  • ...is August 2012 Issue, Fedora Project news stream covers the changes to the Packaging Guidelines, FUDCon Paris Updates(October 13-15, 2012), Fedora Infrastructu ====[Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines====
    20 KB (2,980 words) - 20:31, 5 May 2017
  • ...包的方法,特別是指製作 SPEC 檔的方法。不像其他的 RPM 教學指引,本頁有針對 Fedora 的規格作解說,並附上 Fedora 專用的規約 (guideline) 連結。由於本頁內容是以 Fedora Wiki 系統作維護,比起其� 請注意本篇內文'''並非 '''Fedora 官方軟體包的'''規約''', [[Packaging:Committee| 打包委員會]] 才是處理 Fedora 中軟體打包守則與�
    66 KB (3,733 words) - 21:00, 19 September 2016
  • ...&gt;So, in addition to that draft, this could be the first item in the new Packaging/EPEL page</td></tr> ...2009] [10:11:28] &lt;spot&gt;So, lets vote on this one: Draft + mention on Packaging/EPEL for EL-4</td></tr>
    62 KB (9,594 words) - 15:06, 28 September 2010
  • A plea for the packaging of Google Earth[1] was made by DouglasMcClendon. He explained that he was ...Google Earth") was opened[1] by HansdeGoede. Hans explained that his own guideline for the use of autodownloader was that it was "only for content [...] for
    41 KB (5,924 words) - 21:09, 20 September 2016