From Fedora Project Wiki

  • After more discussion and thought, though, the package maintainers ...it-and-changing-settings/</ref>: "In f12 the default policy for polkit for package kit is to allow users at the
    24 KB (3,481 words) - 19:50, 23 November 2009
  • ...and Finish project focusing on display configuration, more details on the AutoQA activities with rawhide, bugzappers weekly log, and more. In Design news, ...lable<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20090701</ref>. [[User:Jlaska|James Laska]] reported that he had not yet been able to update the QA Goals
    18 KB (2,789 words) - 17:23, 6 July 2009
  • * James Laska (jlaska) * James Laska (jlaska)
    68 KB (8,342 words) - 08:57, 18 September 2016
  • * James Laska (jlaska) * James Laska (jlaska)
    79 KB (9,473 words) - 08:58, 18 September 2016
  • The rules for substituting dots with dashes in package names have been rpm and yum treat a dependency on a package of the form Requires: foo as
    31 KB (4,512 words) - 11:59, 10 February 2011
  • * jlaska (98) * {{bz|566979}} NEW - Failed dependencies and login problem; basic video driver installation, F13 Alpha RC1.
    55 KB (6,957 words) - 19:25, 22 February 2010
  • ...he Sugar desktop on Fedora. From Quality Assurance we hear about some more AutoQA improvements and the last stretch of the Fedora 12 release process. The Des ...nd promises to add new features that will make it more useful to other non Package contributing groups in Fedora...I can very well see this becoming a portal
    33 KB (4,832 words) - 20:05, 6 December 2009
  • The rules for substituting dots with dashes in package names have been rpm and yum treat a dependency on a package of the form Requires: foo as
    32 KB (4,711 words) - 14:19, 10 February 2011
  • When selecting which source to download from upstream and use in a Fedora package, the smallest available (and Fedora compatible) source Since RPM now detects pkgconfig dependencies in all Fedora releases, it is no longer necessary for Fedora packages with
    41 KB (5,854 words) - 18:46, 8 March 2010
  • ...nges involved, which are also included in rsync, split out into a separate package or merged into upstream zlib, but this has not yet been successfully accomp ...age within a few weeks, and also to make a public instance of the autotest/autoqa systems available.
    23 KB (3,575 words) - 17:23, 21 September 2009
  • ...lable<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20090624</ref>. [[User:Jlaska|James Laska]] reported that he had not yet been able to update the QA Goals [[User:Jlaska|James Laska]] reviewed the new schedule for Fedora 12 QA events which has b
    27 KB (4,034 words) - 17:32, 29 June 2009
  • ...nd/or QA plus at least one more net positive karma is required before your package can move out of testing and into Fedora 13. We're still working on the wiki ...t it! (We're working on ways to make it more visible to the user that your package is critical path).
    42 KB (6,119 words) - 18:55, 22 February 2010
  • * AutoQA update ...ckages have explicit Conflicts: tags are acceptable) or unresolved package dependencies during a media-based (DVD) install"
    85 KB (10,515 words) - 00:33, 5 June 2012
  • ...James Laska]] reported solid progress in transferring future tasks for the autoqa project into trac. [[User:Jlaska|James Laska]] reported that he had not had time to work with David Zeuthen
    38 KB (5,718 words) - 17:49, 11 May 2009
  • [[User:Jlaska|James Laska]] posted<ref>http://rawhidewatch.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/unabl ...lable<ref>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20090727</ref>. [[User:Jlaska|James Laska]] reported that he had contacted the infrastructure team's [[Us
    32 KB (4,927 words) - 17:57, 3 August 2009
  • ...when adding one..." [[User:Jlaska|James Laska]] also suggested<ref>http://jlaska.livejournal.com/5561.html</ref> that there are still some high priority def [[User:Jlaska|James Laska]] reported that he had not yet sent out a Test Day feedback sur
    39 KB (5,887 words) - 15:36, 25 May 2009
  • ...1 out of the 146 packages that need to be updated doesn't have all of its dependencies satisfied). ...> about "some of the intricacies of licensing and ensuring that a software package included in Fedora and Red Hat is actually verified to be open source." (Vi
    35 KB (5,265 words) - 14:51, 5 October 2009
  • ...ranslation news, updates to Fedora 11 and news of inclusion of the specspo package in the upcoming release. The artwork team muses about wallpaper gallery de ...ds-again/</ref> a number of reasons that there can never be a common Linux Package format, but suggested that "what others want is something that would actual
    40 KB (6,141 words) - 15:09, 20 May 2009
  • ..., a report on a triage class on real-life bugzapping, and updates from the AutoQA team's activities. Ambassadors this week features several event reports fro ====Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?====
    50 KB (7,198 words) - 14:20, 18 September 2016
  • ...usekeeping, and our issue wraps up with the latest Fedora security-related package releases. Enjoy FWN 276! for better power management. The tuned package contains a daemon that
    53 KB (7,774 words) - 14:59, 31 May 2011
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)