Search results

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-01-06 === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:

[[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]] = Packaging of add-ons for GNU Emacs and XEmacs =

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-03-25} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-01-20 === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:

...se a particular implementation that works best for them at run time. This guideline gives a structure that can enforce the first while allowing the second, as == Packaging BLAS/LAPACK dependent packages ==

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007.03.20} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-03-31 === * Wordpress Plugin Packaging

= Existing Guideline = Motivations for changing the existing guideline:

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-04-01} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:

= Packaging Eclipse Plugins = ...g guideline applies to Fedora 17+. Please consult [[OldPackagingLink]] for packaging guidelines for older Fedora versions. }}

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-05-20} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:

====[Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines==== <ref>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript#Careful_Handling_of_.2Fvar.2Flock.2Fsubsys.2F.3Cservice_name

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007.03.13} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:

=== Packaging Committee Report === ...e to the pkgconfig guidelines: http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging Drafts/pkgconfig

.... Noting his C/Qt experience KevinKofler suggested [2] helping with KDE4 packaging. OttoRey was led to wonder [3] whether there were clear mini-RFCs or oth === DELL firmware packaging Saga Continues. A Bug Gets Squished In rpmUtils.updates.py ===

...e documentation team and live in the general Fedora wiki instead of in the Packaging Guidelines. [[SysVinit to Systemd Cheatsheet]] started for this purpose. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Initscripts

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2008-04-08} === The following drafts have been accepted by FESCO and are to be written into the guidelines:

...guidelines exists. If you're packaging for EPEL 5 you should follow the [[Packaging:Old_Ruby | old ruby guidelines]] instead.}} ...id not work. Please see this [[https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Packaging:Ruby&oldid=363159 earlier version of the guidelines]] if you want your pack

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-04-28 === | style="color: #42427e" | I do wish we could keep these drafts a bit cleaner. I can't really understand from this draft what is being pro

=== Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting 2009-02-17 === ** Somehow during the wiki conversion a guideline page was created that redirected too a draft page. This was in error; FPC