Search results

...m easier to find collectively as well as to follow [[Help:Wiki Structure]] guidelines. [[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]]

...e exempt from part of the Guidelines, please bring the issue to the Fedora Packaging Committee. [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

...owing be added to the Packaging/Guidelines (as a subsection to [[Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot |BuildRoot]] ): Also, the following will be added to Packaging/ReviewGuidelines:

...idelines from [[PackagingGuidelines#Pkgconfig_Files]] to the EPEL specific guidelines. [[Category:Archived packaging guidelines drafts]]

...sary. I am not sure if fedora-devel or fedora-maintainers (or even fedora-packaging) is the proper list. ==== In Packaging/Guidelines: ====

Addendum to the Fedora Licensing Guidelines: [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

== Proposed modification to the Java Packaging Guideline == ...va#ant_2|the sample Ant spec file]] in [[Packaging/Java|the Java packaging guidelines]] includes the command

Since fonts have specific packaging and legal requirements, but are often hidden deep into other stuff, make su Add the following line to [[Packaging/ReviewGuidelines]]:

Proposal: The section of the packaging guidelines on desktop-file-install usage should be amended as follows: [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

== For the guidelines == [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

...in practise for a while, so it would be good to officially allow it in the guidelines. ...pshot package is considered a "pre-release package", you should follow the guidelines listed in [[PreReleasePackages| Pre-Release Packages]] , and use an <code>

In guidelines in common errors section [[Packaging/Guidelines#Rpmlint_Errors]]

The packaging guidelines are not clear in explaining why %makeinstall [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

This is an update to the existing sections in the Packaging/Guidelines. === Packaging Static Libraries ===

Add the following to Packaging/Guidelines [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

...font packages, but a generic packaging consideration that could deserve a packaging guideline. Do not care at all whether symlinks are absolute or relative. No changes to guidelines are needed, and the related warnings should be disabled in the Fedora rpmli

I propose that the following text be added to the Packaging/Guidelines: ...ask your reviewer. If the reviewer is not sure, they should ask the Fedora Packaging Committee.

= Draft package naming guidelines for TeX and LaTeX add on packages = ...aintained for some time now, and Jindrich Novy is planning to move over to packaging TeXLive as a replacement - see [[Releases/FeatureTexLive]] for details on

{{Admon/tip | This policy has been ratified and added to the Packaging Guidelines}} [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]

Any file without active contributors will be archived. ...appear in the existing guidelines. If dropped or rejected, they should be archived. If active they should be renamed.