From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- A place to group archived packaging guideline drafts to make them easier to find collectively as well as to follow [[Help:Wiki S [[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]]81 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 14:17, 21 February 2009
Page text matches
- A place to group archived packaging guideline drafts to make them easier to find collectively as well as to follow [[Help:Wiki S [[Category:Packaging guidelines drafts]]81 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 14:17, 21 February 2009
- '''Update''': ratified by [[Packaging/Comittee]] 2006-09-14 Old guideline:677 bytes (100 words) - 19:38, 21 February 2009
- == Proposed modification to the Java Packaging Guideline == ...ckaging/Java#ant_2|the sample Ant spec file]] in [[Packaging/Java|the Java packaging guidelines]] includes the command688 bytes (114 words) - 20:06, 15 September 2009
- [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]217 bytes (30 words) - 19:44, 21 February 2009
- ...e exempt from part of the Guidelines, please bring the issue to the Fedora Packaging Committee. [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]718 bytes (113 words) - 20:33, 21 February 2009
- Since fonts have specific packaging and legal requirements, but are often hidden deep into other stuff, make su Add the following line to [[Packaging/ReviewGuidelines]]:1 KB (214 words) - 18:53, 27 February 2009
- [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]383 bytes (62 words) - 20:56, 21 February 2009
- ...t the following be added to the Packaging/Guidelines (as a subsection to [[Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot |BuildRoot]] ): Also, the following will be added to Packaging/ReviewGuidelines:1 KB (166 words) - 21:38, 21 February 2009
- = Existing Guideline = No guideline that would limit the use of Epochs exists.1 KB (207 words) - 21:50, 17 February 2009
- [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]489 bytes (81 words) - 21:05, 21 February 2009
- ...sary. I am not sure if fedora-devel or fedora-maintainers (or even fedora-packaging) is the proper list. ==== In Packaging/Guidelines: ====991 bytes (130 words) - 21:07, 21 February 2009
- ...l needed on EL-4 and EL-5), and a link placed to the EPEL section on the [[Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Scrollkeeper]] section. [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]918 bytes (124 words) - 19:20, 15 September 2009
- {{Deprecated | It is now contained in the [[Packaging/Ruby| Ruby guidelines]]}} = Packaging Ruby Gems =4 KB (667 words) - 20:07, 21 February 2009
- Proposal: The section of the packaging guidelines on desktop-file-install usage should be amended as follows: [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]980 bytes (132 words) - 21:31, 21 February 2009
- [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]420 bytes (65 words) - 21:36, 21 February 2009
- This is proposed addendum to Packaging/Python [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]673 bytes (108 words) - 19:12, 15 September 2009
- = File Deps Guideline = == Proposed Guideline ==2 KB (408 words) - 21:15, 21 February 2009
- ...ages, but a generic packaging consideration that could deserve a packaging guideline. {{:Fonts_SIG_signature}}[[Category:Fonts packaging guideline change proposals|2009-01-02, Symlinks, relative]]3 KB (395 words) - 18:16, 27 February 2009
- [[Category:Archived packaging guideline drafts]]820 bytes (120 words) - 21:16, 21 February 2009
- = Existing Guideline = = New Guideline =2 KB (273 words) - 00:59, 6 August 2009