From Fedora Project Wiki

(wwoods response to markmc)
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
* Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA should file a ticket with rel-eng to create a "known-good" symlink' part worries me a little ... what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?
* Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA should file a ticket with rel-eng to create a "known-good" symlink' part worries me a little ... what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?
---[[User:Markmc|markmc]]
---[[User:Markmc|markmc]]
* ''"if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken"'': Sure, if we were doing everything else right this wouldn't be necessary. But relying on that assumption is just a way to avoid solving the problem. And we've had the problem for the past 5 years. Nothing makes me think it's magically going to go away now.
* ''"if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken"'': Sure, if we were doing everything else right this wouldn't be necessary. But relying on that assumption is just a way to avoid solving the problem. And we've had the problem for the past 5 years. Nothing makes me think it's magically going to go away now.
* ''"what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?"'': We won't know until we try. Even if it's only happening every three days, or weekly - it's still better than what we have now.
* ''"what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?"'': We won't know until we try. Even if it's only happening every three days, or weekly - it's still better than what we have now.
---[[User:Wwoods|WillWoods]] 18:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
---[[User:Wwoods|WillWoods]] 18:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:36, 15 June 2009


  • Would be useful, but if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken. The 'someone from QA should file a ticket with rel-eng to create a "known-good" symlink' part worries me a little ... what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?

---markmc

  • "if you were optimistic you could think that the other ideas might lead to a rawhide which is mostly non-broken": Sure, if we were doing everything else right this wouldn't be necessary. But relying on that assumption is just a way to avoid solving the problem. And we've had the problem for the past 5 years. Nothing makes me think it's magically going to go away now.
  • "what's the chances of that getting done dailyish?": We won't know until we try. Even if it's only happening every three days, or weekly - it's still better than what we have now.

---WillWoods 18:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)