|
|
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = Can Spins/SIGS or Fedora remixes change the code enough to meet their goals? = | | = Can Spins/SIGS or Fedora remixes change the code enough to meet their goals? = |
|
| |
|
| === Background ===
| | This content has moved to: |
|
| |
|
| In the present situation, Spins must take all of their content from the official Fedora repositories.
| | [[User:Mdomsch/SWG_Spins]] |
|
| |
|
| === Questions for Spins and the Spins SIG ===
| | [[Category:Strategic working group]] |
| | |
| Given the present situation:
| |
| | |
| # Has any Spin found the present situation unduly restrictive?
| |
| ## If so, how specifically?
| |
| # Has any Spin found they cannot address their target audience properly?
| |
| ## If so, in what way?
| |
| ## Is the root problem that all packages must be in the official repositories?
| |
| # How are you addressing this today?
| |
| # How would you like to address this in the future?
| |
| # Are the resources you would need readily available?
| |
| ## If not, what would you need to properly address this?
| |
| # Is the transition from "Spin" to "Remix" onerous?
| |
| ## If so, what can be done to make it less so?
| |
| | |
| | |
| === Possible Solutions ===
| |
| | |
| === Risk/Benefit ===
| |
Latest revision as of 19:44, 15 March 2010
Can Spins/SIGS or Fedora remixes change the code enough to meet their goals?
This content has moved to:
User:Mdomsch/SWG_Spins
