From Fedora Project Wiki

  • ...it applications on x86_64). Dropping i686 architecture support from a leaf package will no longer be considered a breaking change, will not require any announ ...ages that are built on i686 are actually used (i.e. "multilib" support for Wine, Steam, etc. on x86_64).
    12 KB (1,934 words) - 11:02, 24 August 2022
  • == Usage cases/rationale == Generally, yum's behavior is, 'install package for all available
    7 KB (1,034 words) - 15:48, 9 July 2008
  • ...r for Direct3D 9/10/11 which allows running 3D applications on Linux using Wine. ...be it wine-dxvk package or by any other means). With this change accepted, wine would use DXVK instead of wined3d on supported GPUs automatically.
    12 KB (1,976 words) - 18:01, 7 August 2020
  • * scop will fire some test builds (site note: there was a problem; see the lists) 19:59 < spot> | given enough time, i'm sure people will find exception cases
    31 KB (4,146 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
  • | name = Fedora Test Days ...-test-day #fedora-test-day] ([http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=fedora-test-day webirc])
    31 KB (4,672 words) - 19:35, 26 June 2015
  • ....org/updates/(name)-EVR report to Bodhi] whether it solves the problem. To test the update, run this command: ...taskID=XXXXXXX packagename-EVR]. If you are affected by this issue, please test this update and report your results to the [[rhbug:XXXXXX|bug report]].
    28 KB (4,256 words) - 15:18, 28 January 2012
  • ....org/updates/(name)-EVR report to Bodhi] whether it solves the problem. To test the update, run this command: ...taskID=XXXXXXX packagename-EVR]. If you are affected by this issue, please test this update and report your results to the [[rhbug:XXXXXX|bug report]].
    30 KB (4,491 words) - 00:01, 15 March 2018
  • Package names: '''NOTE: If you want to test, please use only one of the below methods, not both'''
    20 KB (3,148 words) - 14:25, 21 March 2013
  • * [http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-August/092368.html Proposed meeting agenda] == F14 Alpha test milestones ==
    30 KB (3,907 words) - 20:46, 2 August 2010
  • * [https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-November/msg01223.html Proposed meeting agenda] * jlaska to send request for retrospective feedback to fedora-test-list@
    52 KB (6,717 words) - 09:00, 18 September 2016
  • ...-test-day #fedora-test-day] ([http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=fedora-test-day webirc]) ...the [[QA/Test_Days|current schedule]] and see if a similar but more recent Test Day is planned or has already happened.}}
    27 KB (3,989 words) - 21:17, 26 June 2015
  • .... In PlanetFedora "Tech Tidbits" contains some juicy morsels on evaluating package sizes and Haskell. In Developments we examine the process of "Getting Back ...ory locations. What we don't have quite yet is the updated fedora-release package in the old updates location that will get you the new keys and the new repo
    39 KB (5,748 words) - 08:16, 18 September 2016
  • ...g.cgi?id=441080 441080]||qpidc: $RPM_OPT_FLAGS not used, useless debuginfo package .../bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245387 245387]||broken URL in pam_abl package description
    994 KB (150,950 words) - 23:19, 29 December 2012