From Fedora Project Wiki

  • = Packaging Java Web Applications = {{admon/tip|Java Guidelines|
    4 KB (646 words) - 21:03, 17 February 2009
  • |'''rpmdev-diff'''||Diff contents of two archives |'''rpmdev-extract'''||Extract various archives, "tar xvf" style
    2 KB (221 words) - 15:21, 21 July 2017
  • ...e items should be merged in from the full [[Packaging/Guidelines|Packaging Guidelines]] but given that many reviewers base their reviews on the former also out o [] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
    6 KB (981 words) - 22:59, 18 February 2010
  • From the official packageing guidelines 1. The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
    6 KB (973 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
  • [ ] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
    3 KB (458 words) - 22:57, 18 February 2010
  • - The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - The package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
    6 KB (1,103 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
  • = Package Review Guidelines = ...on the [https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging Fedora packaging list] .
    14 KB (2,045 words) - 17:32, 25 January 2019
  • Cloned from ["Packaging/ReviewGuidelines"] . = Package Review Guidelines =
    15 KB (2,502 words) - 19:52, 13 August 2008
  • ...of the Haskell Special Interest Group is to maintain, grow, and guide the packaging of Haskell projects in Fedora. ...s://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/haskell@lists.fedoraproject.org/ archives]) for general discussion
    12 KB (1,549 words) - 16:38, 20 February 2024
  • ...kaging Guidelines, section [https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/#_using_forges_hosted_revision_control Referencing Source]}} This proposal is a requisite for the [[More_Go_packaging|More Go packaging draft]].
    8 KB (1,224 words) - 16:43, 24 February 2021
  • My template for review. This is only formated, slightly modified form of [[Packaging:ReviewGuidelines]] [] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.<br>
    7 KB (1,132 words) - 07:42, 18 September 2016
  • ...reference. '''This is not a policy nor should the notes be interpreted as guidelines!''' ...chives/fedora-packaging/2006-December/msg00066.html, http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2007-February/msg00328.html
    4 KB (697 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • ...grant plugin configuration file upon installation. As most of the RubyGems guidelines apply to them, this guide discusses only specifics in which Vagrant plugins == Naming Guidelines ==
    8 KB (1,110 words) - 11:46, 3 December 2015
  • Using 'fedora-usermgmt' is optional and not required by packaging guidelines. When you want it for your package, register a user in the [[PackageUserReg * [https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-March/msg00688.html How fedora-usermgmt works]
    7 KB (934 words) - 19:10, 24 February 2009
  • ...valuate the best way to have extras use updates-testing repository and the guidelines must be uniform for both) ''[I think this is overkill. What specific examp https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2006-March/msg00455.html
    7 KB (1,090 words) - 10:06, 18 September 2016
  • Using 'fedora-usermgmt' is optional and not required by packaging guidelines. When you want it for your package, register a user in the [[PackageUserReg * [https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-March/msg00688.html How fedora-usermgmt works]
    8 KB (1,042 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
  • ...tions. As a result packaging fonts will often require more legal work than packaging your average FLOSS app. Before you continue, check our [[Legal_consideratio # Fonts released upstream in separate archives '''MUST''' be packaged in separate source packages (''src.rpm''), unless th
    11 KB (1,643 words) - 20:01, 21 December 2018
  • Guidelines. [ ] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
    8 KB (1,178 words) - 11:51, 10 October 2021
  • ...g. Please refer to the [[Packaging:Python_Old|previous version]] of these guidelines for older releases.}} ...e '''must''' provide <code>python3-example</code>. However, as the naming guidelines mandate that the python3 subpackage be named <code>python3-example</code>,
    23 KB (3,514 words) - 19:33, 14 October 2016
  • === Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting of {2007-11-20} === * There are components of the proposal which go beyond packaging policy and are not considered by FPC. This includes the CompsPolicy docume
    19 KB (2,918 words) - 03:23, 21 December 2008
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)