From Fedora Project Wiki

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • * Easier to develop/maintain/share patches. * How do we separate "upstream" code from patches applied in the Fedora package.
    950 bytes (142 words) - 22:21, 8 January 2010
  • == Patches ==
    798 bytes (124 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • ** Lougher has posted lzma-squashfs patches to the kernel list on December 7th. So effectively larger spins may be doab *** Lougher has posted a revised set of patches based on feedback.
    1 KB (242 words) - 02:05, 15 December 2009
  • This a list of packages fixes for which we need to ensure the patches are also sent to Fedora. http://fedorapeople.org/~hrw/aarch64/for-fedora/ has patches for several entries. For those which miss ask "hrw" on irc and they will be
    4 KB (540 words) - 09:17, 24 February 2014
  • ...r Rau enhanced the patches to include the use of Back/Cancel buttons. The patches also include GUI screens as well. Alexander used code from the bootdisk fi ...se patches are for anaconda. You can download the conglomeration of these patches here:
    2 KB (258 words) - 00:10, 8 August 2018
  • = Anaconda Patches = == Anaconda-runtime patches ==
    3 KB (476 words) - 00:33, 8 August 2018
  • == Patches ==
    879 bytes (129 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
  • == All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment == All patches in Fedora spec files '''SHOULD''' have a comment above them about their ups
    2 KB (277 words) - 11:31, 9 October 2021
  • * Wants to use D-BUS patches, see [http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/GConf_D-BUS] * Upstream Fedora probably wants these patches too
    2 KB (235 words) - 15:28, 29 March 2015
  • ...g patches. RexDieter. We're starting to have quite a large collection of patches, many of which are upstreamable. Just do it. :) '''Upstreaming patches''':
    2 KB (274 words) - 13:42, 28 May 2008
  • == GCC 4.4 Patches == * Hopefully all the gcc-4.4 patches would be merged soon after March 21 2009.
    1 KB (204 words) - 06:55, 15 September 2010
  • * [http://ext2.sourceforge.net/48bitext3/patches/patches-2.6.17-rc4-05242006/ Patches against 2.6.17rc4 (updated 5/24)] ...&m=114784923909867&w=2 [RFC 5/7 ext3 blocks: fixes from review comments on patches 1-4]
    3 KB (458 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
  • * Fedora's patches for KDE3 in KDE4 ...for KDE3 should be reviewed for KDE4 if they are still needed. The needed patches should be ported then or better go upstream.
    2 KB (293 words) - 13:35, 28 May 2008
  • [[Image:KarstenWade_Patches_KarstenWade]]/Patches/FedoraSystemHomepagePatch1 Fedora System Homepage patch 1]
    128 bytes (13 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
  • #REDIRECT [[Changes/Patches in Forge macros - Auto macros - Detached rpm changelogs]]
    85 bytes (13 words) - 14:25, 30 June 2020
  • == Patches == ...service, to certain extend. Or we could patch versions compatible with our patches, and leave newer ones unpatched, but that seems to make it difficult to pre
    3 KB (465 words) - 17:33, 19 March 2015
  • ** All patches were rediffed in devel, so the new _default_patch_fuzz there is 0 (it was 2 ** For new patches a fuzz level of 0 should be used where reasonable.
    1 KB (140 words) - 17:30, 2 December 2008
  • * A [http://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/fedora/diffs-f11/ set of patches] necessary to make Fedora packages build for ARM. * A [http://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/arm/fedora/diffs-f10/ set of patches] necessary to make Fedora packages build for ARM.
    3 KB (503 words) - 17:20, 17 November 2009
  • ...ager#Package_details_.3E_sources_.3E_patches | Package details > sources > patches]] == Package details > sources > patches ==
    3 KB (327 words) - 15:09, 3 November 2011
  • == Have patches ==
    2 KB (205 words) - 15:42, 6 November 2014
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)