From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- 936 bytes (95 words) - 14:12, 6 December 2013
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:EPEL/Packages/mediawiki118]]48 bytes (5 words) - 19:22, 21 November 2014
- ...aproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Orphaning_Process/ orphaned packages]. This keeps out unowned software and prevents future problems down the roa # Retriring packages nobody wants to adopt.3 KB (483 words) - 20:28, 2 October 2021
- * changes to isolated/leaf package without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution * limited scope changes without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution16 KB (2,506 words) - 18:28, 23 June 2020
- == Network configuration packages == There is no uniform way to test the following packages.5 KB (741 words) - 10:42, 14 December 2015
- = Packages for Embedded Development =4 KB (618 words) - 21:38, 13 December 2010
- 1 KB (133 words) - 14:13, 6 December 2013
File:Myfedora myprofile-packages.png (800 × 1,594 (242 KB)) - 21:36, 28 January 2009- #REDIRECT [[Retire orphaned packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 09:52, 10 February 2010
- = Fedora Astronomy Packages = ...sed| proposed packages]] and [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/Refused| refused packages]] .5 KB (640 words) - 07:15, 1 September 2021
- = Octave Forge Packages = ...es] into F15. (See the [[Packaging:Octave|packaging guidelines for octave packages]])9 KB (1,306 words) - 19:14, 30 August 2011
- 160 bytes (15 words) - 14:15, 6 December 2013
File:Myfedora myprofile-packages.svg (800 × 1,594 (344 KB)) - 21:36, 28 January 2009- == Review of Power specific packages == The goal is to review all architecture packages with respect to their need during installer run and during boot. During ins4 KB (655 words) - 15:33, 11 August 2017
- Every release prior to the Feature Freeze we deprecate all packages that [[FTBFS]]. This keeps out software that no longer builds from source, # Detecting a list of FTBFS packages and the dependencies that will be broken if they are removed.5 KB (729 words) - 17:52, 3 November 2015
- #REDIRECT [[Retire orphaned packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 08:58, 30 May 2014
- ...ode>sendmail-cf</code>, or, more generally, anything that depends on these packages) This list was generated by looking at all the packages in current Core and Extras Rawhide that own a file in <code>/etc/rc.d/init.18 KB (2,663 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:L10N Important packages]]45 bytes (6 words) - 12:13, 25 May 2010
- 46 bytes (7 words) - 02:54, 21 December 2008
- 3 KB (237 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013
Page text matches
File:NoarchCandidates.txt List of "source packages: sub packages" that should be convertable to noarch without any work as they do neither c(51 KB) - 10:30, 15 June 2009- To assist packagers in bringing Telepathy-related packages to Fedora and assisting in their continued maintenance by providing timely == Telepathy packages awaiting review ==720 bytes (87 words) - 05:09, 20 August 2008
- == Packages Maintained == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/mintojoseph406 bytes (53 words) - 12:46, 2 June 2011
- == Packages I maintain: ==488 bytes (71 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- ...eMaintainers]] for details about how packages, including core distribution packages, are now maintained. Please do not refer to Fedora as "Fedora Core" anymore521 bytes (73 words) - 09:51, 11 February 2011
- === Orphaned Packages === * Discussed some issues with orphaned packages:1 KB (151 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008
- === Guidelines Around Compatibility Packages === == Compatibility Packages ==1 KB (205 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
- List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in [[L10N GUI]]2 KB (265 words) - 10:45, 8 April 2017
- == My packages ==919 bytes (140 words) - 22:49, 5 March 2009
- * Building packages for inclusion in EPEL/Extras. == Packages ==930 bytes (127 words) - 16:38, 24 May 2008
- == Fedora Packages I Maintain/Co-maintain == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/dgoodwin349 bytes (39 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- === Packages === ...e list of my packages see the [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/anishpatil current list in Fedora Pkg Db]574 bytes (81 words) - 13:07, 15 January 2014
- ...'', '''Eclipse''', and '''Apache Tomcat''', as well as other Java software packages included in this release, are compatible with this environment. Refer to this section of the Release Notes for information on installing Java packages:1 KB (201 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
- I like Fedora a lot, and I would like to contribute and maintain a lot new of packages to Fedora that are currently unavailable to Fedora Users. ...interested in providing Haskell packages (from [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/pkg-list.html Hackage Repository]) for the GHC Haskell compiler.670 bytes (97 words) - 19:15, 28 August 2008
- === Bundled packages already in Fedora === === Bundled packages which should be fine to put in Fedora ===2 KB (248 words) - 09:23, 12 August 2014
- * Orphaned Packages will be droped if no one steps up to maintain them ...a specific date; 2:obsoleted by a newer version; 3: still fc4 as disstag) packages before branching/when FC5 is released1 KB (188 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- * pirut will only be able to install packages listed in comps.xml ...tly should be listed in the comps file (e.g. no devel, libs or perl-module packages=769 bytes (116 words) - 16:30, 24 May 2008
- '''Updating firefox will break the packages listed below for each release, unless they are rebuilt and updates are push ...ageMaintainers/UsefulScripts| ]] to look up and email the owners of those packages. [http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/files/pkgquery.py ivazquez' pkgquery.py]2 KB (252 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
- = Packages Lacking Extras Bugzilla Components = This is a list of packages which lack Extras Bugzilla Components. If you think it should have an Extr580 bytes (88 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
- ...I'm the unix sysadmin for the Biology department at Duke - so most of the packages I'm working on for Fedora Extras are bioinformatics related somehow. ...of the bioperl and deps and is currently (2007-03-27) pushing the orphaned packages through a re-review process.1 KB (174 words) - 16:36, 24 May 2008