From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- ...f3916e4d76c83ebf8a6b4ff81c4cb05597">Amateur Radio Special Interest Group - Packages</h1> ===Packages now in Fedora===28 KB (3,963 words) - 15:33, 6 February 2022
- Fedora includes a [[Fonts inclusion history|large selection]] of font packages. Unfortunately, due to lack of strong font release conventions, variable pa ...ing ways you can help enhance existing packages, and ways you can tune new packages during creation.3 KB (428 words) - 12:42, 23 March 2011
- #REDIRECT [[Retire Orphaned Packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 09:04, 30 May 2014
- 2 members (1 subcategory, 0 files) - 21:12, 8 June 2008
- 2 KB (274 words) - 19:15, 29 June 2013
- == Candidate Packages == == Eligible Packages ==4 KB (511 words) - 10:07, 10 April 2024
- 46 bytes (7 words) - 12:07, 2 November 2008
- 5 KB (754 words) - 01:29, 12 August 2018
- ==Proposed Packaging Guidelines for Documentation Packages generated by Publican== '''Proposed:''' Documentation packages be named with the OS version number in the package name to allow parallel i3 KB (421 words) - 19:57, 30 March 2009
- 35 bytes (4 words) - 18:29, 22 June 2010
- ...to a -devel package. See the [[Packaging:Guidelines#Devel_Packages| Devel Packages Guideline]] if you are unclear on what these files are. [19] === Devel Packages ===2 KB (260 words) - 15:52, 5 October 2011
- The following packages ship Flash files. While I haven't gone through all of them, none of them I /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/typepadapp/static/soundmanager/soundmanager2.swf10 KB (1,433 words) - 21:38, 1 August 2013
- 35 bytes (4 words) - 20:56, 21 June 2010
- Install yum-utils and issue the following command to see what packages are using package "foo":422 bytes (56 words) - 22:04, 22 February 2009
- = Harden All Packages <!-- The name of your change proposal --> = ...rdened. Beginning with Fedora 23 this will now become the defaults for all packages. You can compare the security by running the following as root:12 KB (1,867 words) - 08:50, 9 January 2019
- == Proposed Packages to be included in Live CD (already in Fedora) == * We are first working to include these packages in Fedora, the list of packages to be in Live CD will come later. Please, follow-up all work throught [[SIG317 bytes (49 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- ...zio utente. Al suo posto ora si usa [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/qemu qemu]4 KB (451 words) - 08:10, 3 April 2012
- 334 bytes (47 words) - 01:23, 9 March 2015
- 44 bytes (6 words) - 22:50, 11 January 2009
File:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.png (1,250 × 700 (67 KB)) - 18:02, 6 August 2008
Page text matches
- * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Langpacks/BasePackages Base Packages] ...raproject.org/wiki/I18N/Langpacks/PerLanguageLangpackPackages Per Language Packages]2 KB (189 words) - 06:00, 9 March 2020
- We want to move packages from depending on tomcat5 (and its APIs) to tomcat6. Here are the various P == Packages ==767 bytes (86 words) - 15:17, 16 December 2010
- ...d Hat Linux and other Fedora Extras packages. If you have installed custom packages from other respositories, it is likely that you will run into compatibility ...repositories is to completely avoid publishing packages that somebody else packages. This is obviously not an option because it would be too limiting for the F2 KB (382 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- = Fedora Astronomy, refused packages = ...ges already in Fedora]] and [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/Proposed| proposed packages]] .2 KB (315 words) - 20:11, 3 November 2014
- ...bution ISO. These packages were formerly part of the Fedora Extras set of packages:373 bytes (55 words) - 10:15, 14 April 2009
- === Cleaning Old Files and Packages === ...d config files stay in my system. Is there any way to remove theses unused packages and old config files?''2 KB (411 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- * Get all packages built with the new and reduced set of packages installed in the default mock buildroots. ...) packages except large ones containing static content (eg. some game data packages) are expected to be rebuilt. '''Note:''' remember to do "cvs up" in your p4 KB (557 words) - 19:16, 28 May 2008
- * a proper policy to tag packages in CVS that are dead / unused / whatever (like [https://www.redhat.com/arch * create Packaging/MaintaincePolicy which policys or hints how packages should be maintained1 KB (188 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
- = Large Data Packages = Large, arch-independent data packages do not need to be recompiled for different Fedora releases. If they were r919 bytes (134 words) - 02:13, 25 February 2009
- This wiki page was created to track progress on the MATE Desktop packages; anyone if free to help with the pending tasks. Takers please pick a task y ...ling to provide a fix, patch or any other improvement for the MATE Desktop packages please go to ''#fedora-mate'' on FreeNode and ask for help on how to get st2 KB (338 words) - 19:56, 21 December 2012
- === Packages under review === ...in request]]. please move it to [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages| accepted packages]],990 bytes (143 words) - 13:57, 18 January 2015
- ...s to invoke system-install-packages whenever they need specific additional packages number of other associated packages must be installed in order for all of the features within the package to2 KB (275 words) - 18:30, 1 August 2008
- List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_GUI3 KB (368 words) - 22:00, 31 August 2016
- == Maintainer of the following fedora packages ==419 bytes (55 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- [[Category:Fonts|Packages]] [[Category:Packages|Fonts]]215 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:27, 27 June 2008
- ...e would need are "source-only dkms payload" packages for each module. Such packages would include the necessary kernel module source code and dkms specific con ...believe have the potential for being mainlined. DKMS source-only payload packages could be reviewed on a Fedora release basis to see if active progress has b2 KB (296 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
- ...usses the reasons for keeping the "jpp" substring in release tags for Java packages that have been imported from JPackage === ...y: The substring is needed to allow existence of separate stacks of common packages<BR>2 KB (364 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
- EPEL strives to produce bug free and stable packages. Testing and Quality assurance is vital to this effort. == Testing packages ==2 KB (252 words) - 20:03, 6 January 2022
- = Access Control with Fedora Packages = ...ainers. This is the safe default as it ensures that new security-critical packages don't have a window between being set up as a package and having the access1 KB (237 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
- * F8(~4400),F9(~5000) packages has built using mock and koji. [http://8ne.sakura.ne.jp:20007/pub/linux/fed * F10(~5700) packages have almost done.2 KB (271 words) - 10:05, 15 January 2009