From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- * changes to isolated/leaf package without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution * limited scope changes without the impact on other packages/rest of the distribution16 KB (2,506 words) - 18:28, 23 June 2020
- = Packages for Embedded Development =4 KB (618 words) - 21:38, 13 December 2010
- 1 KB (133 words) - 14:13, 6 December 2013
File:Myfedora myprofile-packages.png (800 × 1,594 (242 KB)) - 21:36, 28 January 2009- = Fedora Astronomy Packages = ...sed| proposed packages]] and [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/Refused| refused packages]] .5 KB (640 words) - 07:15, 1 September 2021
- #REDIRECT [[Retire orphaned packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 09:52, 10 February 2010
- = Octave Forge Packages = ...es] into F15. (See the [[Packaging:Octave|packaging guidelines for octave packages]])9 KB (1,306 words) - 19:14, 30 August 2011
- 160 bytes (15 words) - 14:15, 6 December 2013
File:Myfedora myprofile-packages.svg (800 × 1,594 (344 KB)) - 21:36, 28 January 2009- == Review of Power specific packages == The goal is to review all architecture packages with respect to their need during installer run and during boot. During ins4 KB (655 words) - 15:33, 11 August 2017
- Every release prior to the Feature Freeze we deprecate all packages that [[FTBFS]]. This keeps out software that no longer builds from source, # Detecting a list of FTBFS packages and the dependencies that will be broken if they are removed.5 KB (729 words) - 17:52, 3 November 2015
- ...ode>sendmail-cf</code>, or, more generally, anything that depends on these packages) This list was generated by looking at all the packages in current Core and Extras Rawhide that own a file in <code>/etc/rc.d/init.18 KB (2,663 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Retire orphaned packages]]38 bytes (4 words) - 08:58, 30 May 2014
- #REDIRECT [[PackagingDrafts/No bundling of fonts in other packages (2008-07-24)]]81 bytes (11 words) - 17:50, 7 December 2008
- ...ckert and I'm your teacher for todays IRC classroom lesson on building RPM packages | style="color: #407a40" | any idea why we are building packages after all?63 KB (7,606 words) - 07:57, 18 September 2016
- == Devel Packages == ...must be designed with a logical separation of files. Specifically, -devel packages must be used to contain files which are intended solely for development or4 KB (647 words) - 15:11, 19 October 2011
- ...he <code>rpm-build</code> package installed on your system, as well as the packages normally required for FDP work -- i.e. the "Authoring and Publishing" group5 KB (818 words) - 18:34, 22 February 2009
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/UnderReview]]57 bytes (6 words) - 20:05, 3 November 2014
- ...on the implementation and the current state of critical path|Critical path packages}} Define a "Critical Path" set of packages that require special care when updating in rawhide and releases.4 KB (649 words) - 14:46, 7 July 2010
- = Fedora Astronomy proposed packages = This is list of packages proposed to be included in Fedora.6 KB (975 words) - 17:41, 15 March 2016
Page text matches
- === Packages under review === ...in request]]. please move it to [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages| accepted packages]],990 bytes (143 words) - 13:57, 18 January 2015
- ...s to invoke system-install-packages whenever they need specific additional packages number of other associated packages must be installed in order for all of the features within the package to2 KB (275 words) - 18:30, 1 August 2008
- List of packages for l10n FAD. These packages should be in sync with packages in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N_GUI3 KB (368 words) - 22:00, 31 August 2016
- == Maintainer of the following fedora packages ==419 bytes (55 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008
- [[Category:Fonts|Packages]] [[Category:Packages|Fonts]]215 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:27, 27 June 2008
- ...e would need are "source-only dkms payload" packages for each module. Such packages would include the necessary kernel module source code and dkms specific con ...believe have the potential for being mainlined. DKMS source-only payload packages could be reviewed on a Fedora release basis to see if active progress has b2 KB (296 words) - 16:27, 24 May 2008
- ...usses the reasons for keeping the "jpp" substring in release tags for Java packages that have been imported from JPackage === ...y: The substring is needed to allow existence of separate stacks of common packages<BR>2 KB (364 words) - 16:37, 24 May 2008
- EPEL strives to produce bug free and stable packages. Testing and Quality assurance is vital to this effort. == Testing packages ==2 KB (252 words) - 20:03, 6 January 2022
- = Access Control with Fedora Packages = ...ainers. This is the safe default as it ensures that new security-critical packages don't have a window between being set up as a package and having the access1 KB (237 words) - 16:31, 24 May 2008
- * F8(~4400),F9(~5000) packages has built using mock and koji. [http://8ne.sakura.ne.jp:20007/pub/linux/fed * F10(~5700) packages have almost done.2 KB (271 words) - 10:05, 15 January 2009
- === Packages Maintained ===831 bytes (108 words) - 05:24, 26 June 2008
- ...10.0, those new packages will be retagged into dist-f9-perl. The remaining packages will then be rebuilt in dist-f9-perl. Some modules which were previously pa ...ich all of the other perl-related packages needed to rebuild. All of these packages will be built against perl-5.10.0 in dist-f9-perl, to ensure that perl-5.102 KB (333 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- === Bundled packages already in Fedora === === Bundled packages which should be fine to put in Fedora ===2 KB (262 words) - 12:52, 11 March 2014
- ...ory information attached to them so it is possible for users to browse for packages. Currently, we have the RPM Group tag and comps.xml for this. ...rent people composing package groups may want to include different sets of packages into the groups.4 KB (592 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
- == Packages that embed code copies == ...lnerabilities often happen as a result because security sensitive embedded packages may be out of date and have outstanding issues.780 bytes (118 words) - 04:15, 11 November 2010
- ...[ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/rpms-for-exim Exim RPM packages] and a variety of packages on the (now-irrelevant) page http://www.timj.co.uk/linux/rpms.php. More rec Tim is currently maintaining the following packages in Extras:3 KB (393 words) - 16:29, 24 May 2008
- Packages must not contain explicit ''Requires'' on libraries except when absolutely the required packages. Explicit dependencies on specific package names may aid the2 KB (244 words) - 16:49, 22 February 2009
- Packages listed below don't install any desktop related packages (like GUI libraries, ConsoleKit, ...) as dependencies. === Base packages ===932 bytes (106 words) - 12:53, 3 December 2009
- = FE packages no longer available in the FE development repository = This page lists FE packages that appear in the <code>owners.list</code> file but are no longer present2 KB (289 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
- I maintain these packages: Retired packages:398 bytes (49 words) - 18:53, 3 September 2008