From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Design Suite]]56 bytes (7 words) - 20:30, 22 August 2013
- https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/88 bytes (14 words) - 09:21, 14 June 2020
- 56 members (2 subcategories, 0 files) - 16:37, 8 June 2008
- ...isor. It has since been replaced by [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/qemu qemu]3 KB (399 words) - 10:35, 3 July 2010
- This is a list of the docs packages we need created for each Fedora release, current as of February 2014 (list ...arly in the release cycle. We should only have to go back and ask for more packages on a very infrequent basis.5 KB (586 words) - 02:20, 3 February 2014
- 109 bytes (20 words) - 19:47, 26 May 2021
- ...elease of what was "OLPC 9.1" into a "Fedora 11 release", and to bring the packages outside of the current Fedora process inside of it. If we can get it done == Packages branched from Mainline ==14 KB (2,085 words) - 12:43, 16 July 2009
- #REDIRECT [[User:Rathann/Packages]]35 bytes (4 words) - 19:42, 4 June 2008
- [[Category:Packages|bitlbee]]705 bytes (113 words) - 18:01, 25 October 2008
- 0 bytes (0 words) - 06:10, 13 April 2016
- 0 bytes (0 words) - 10:50, 14 February 2019
- #REDIRECT [[Deprecated packages]]33 bytes (3 words) - 12:27, 21 April 2011
- Pardon my ignorance, but doesn't defining certain packages as offensive (from what point of view?) go against the whole point of Fedor ...on, so that's more accurate. No matter how one refers to this category of packages, someone will object to it. (I find "objectionable" to be as questionable1 KB (204 words) - 12:09, 15 July 2011
- 34 bytes (4 words) - 15:55, 8 August 2014
- Packages currently pending Review: Packages I'm currently Reviewing:948 bytes (103 words) - 17:25, 26 June 2010
- ...may wish to avoid them. This list may be an aid to those users. To exclude packages, add their names to an ''exclude'' directive in the ''/etc/yum.conf'' file, Fedora does not ban offensive language in packages.2 KB (239 words) - 11:57, 15 July 2011
- 2 members (2 subcategories, 0 files) - 21:14, 8 June 2008
- #REDIRECT [[User:Rdieter/packages]]35 bytes (4 words) - 17:25, 26 June 2010
- 547 bytes (77 words) - 18:59, 18 January 2009
- 0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 08:56, 26 June 2008
Page text matches
- = Modified packages = == Updated packages ==276 bytes (23 words) - 11:21, 9 January 2009
- === Packages === [[Image:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.png|500px|Click to view larger version]]209 bytes (21 words) - 14:09, 20 July 2009
- == Packages == ...s I maintain or help with are [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/tmz here].398 bytes (56 words) - 02:39, 6 June 2008
- = Fedora Astronomy packages under review = ...sed| refused packages]] or [[SIGs/Astronomy/Packages/Proposed| proposed packages]] .823 bytes (106 words) - 20:27, 3 November 2014
- * Fedora page (with testing packages): [http://tsmetana.fedorapeople.org/ tsmetana.fedorapeople.org] == Packages ==515 bytes (70 words) - 10:02, 12 March 2009
- === Packages ===134 bytes (20 words) - 14:08, 4 December 2022
- Maintainer of BIND9 and dnsmasq, co-maintainer of more DNS related packages. === Packages I maintain: ===269 bytes (33 words) - 22:07, 3 January 2024
- === Packages ===92 bytes (10 words) - 08:34, 22 April 2023
- An installation using all packages made available by anaconda. This can be accomplished two ways: ...this test is to ensure proper package ordering given a large enough set of packages.600 bytes (82 words) - 17:19, 16 February 2009
- Repository and CVS status pages for requesting manual copies and removals of packages: * [[Extras/OrphanedPackages| Orphaned packages]] - Packages that need new maintainers518 bytes (66 words) - 20:45, 16 February 2010
- * Building packages for inclusion in EPEL/Extras. == Packages ==542 bytes (79 words) - 14:08, 9 March 2009
- == packages ==205 bytes (23 words) - 10:37, 13 September 2013
- ...only the bits that are not conflicting with KDE3). So lets' see, what KDE4-Packages are ready to compile. | '''Application''' || '''Missing headers etc.''' || '''Upstream packages''' || '''Solution'''861 bytes (128 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
- == Packages == * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/tgraf211 bytes (24 words) - 11:52, 2 April 2013
- === Packages === ...e list of my packages see the [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/pwu current list in Fedora Pkg Db]327 bytes (45 words) - 16:10, 24 August 2011
- == Packages ==435 bytes (50 words) - 05:48, 20 September 2016
- = Draft package naming guidelines for TeX and LaTeX add on packages = ...d on packages are named tetex-foo, reflecting the fact that they are addon packages for teTeX. With the move to TeXLive, this no longer makes sense.2 KB (318 words) - 18:47, 27 February 2009
- == My Packages == == My Packages For Review ==2 KB (220 words) - 10:23, 20 July 2013
- = Packages Needing Bootstrap = ...ould be rebuilt between Fedora Core revisions. This helps us avoid having packages that are linked against old versions of libraries and fail to compile with872 bytes (143 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- ! Use Case !! No. !! seed packages | [[Base/Packages/m1|Minimal chroot]] || align="right"|15 || glibc, bash568 bytes (65 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013