(remove horrendously formatted IRC log) |
(Comment about packages using HAL through D-Bus.) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
See scope. We might need to do a more detailed analysis of the inverse hal dependencies. - Matthias | See scope. We might need to do a more detailed analysis of the inverse hal dependencies. - Matthias | ||
: Careful, not all the packages using HAL are linked to one of its libraries, for example Solid uses it through Qt 4's D-Bus binding only, so the list may be incomplete. --[[User:Kkofler|Kkofler]] 21:25, 11 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:25, 11 July 2008
Questions
Will anything using hal now need to be ported by F10, or will that keep working? In particular I am wondering about thunar-volman (the Xfce Thunar plugin that handles removable devices). Is the any docs or API info that I could point upstream thunar-volman at? - kevin
"anything using hal" - no. See scope: things using hal for disk information will have to be ported, such as gvfs, Solid and thunar-volman. I've added a link to the api docs. - Matthias
Would we really roll back this feature if the KDE side of things isn't done in time? - JesseKeating
I don't think so. We'd probably look for a way to keep the hal disks part running next to DK-disks without stepping on each others toes, but thats for David to say in detail. - Matthias
What about anaconda integration?
anaconda integration will happen when the anaconda team decides that it is the right thing to do. - Matthias
What Fedora packages would be affected by this change?
See scope. We might need to do a more detailed analysis of the inverse hal dependencies. - Matthias
- Careful, not all the packages using HAL are linked to one of its libraries, for example Solid uses it through Qt 4's D-Bus binding only, so the list may be incomplete. --Kkofler 21:25, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
A porting guide for Fedora packagers would be extremely helpful.
I agree that a porting document would be useful in general, not just for Fedora packagers. - Matthias
How about a hal compatibility layer?
Compatibility layers are generally a bad idea when we can avoid them. From my understanding, the DK-disks api is very similar to the hal disk api, so porting should not be hard. We have the source. - Matthias
FESCo 2008-07-10
- This feature is not ready for acceptance the questions from FESCo are above
- Please move feature page to Category:ProposedFedora10 when your page is ready for re-review.