From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
- #REDIRECT [[SIGs/Design Software/Packages/Design Suite]]56 bytes (7 words) - 20:30, 22 August 2013
- 56 members (2 subcategories, 0 files) - 16:37, 8 June 2008
- [[Category:Packages|bitlbee]]705 bytes (113 words) - 18:01, 25 October 2008
- #REDIRECT [[Deprecated packages]]33 bytes (3 words) - 12:27, 21 April 2011
- This is a list of the docs packages we need created for each Fedora release, current as of February 2014 (list ...arly in the release cycle. We should only have to go back and ask for more packages on a very infrequent basis.5 KB (586 words) - 02:20, 3 February 2014
- 2 members (2 subcategories, 0 files) - 21:14, 8 June 2008
- 109 bytes (20 words) - 19:47, 26 May 2021
- #REDIRECT [[User:Rathann/Packages]]35 bytes (4 words) - 19:42, 4 June 2008
- These are packages that the [[ISV Special Interest Group]] need reviewers and sponsors for.434 bytes (63 words) - 19:18, 10 December 2008
- #REDIRECT [[User:Rdieter/packages]]35 bytes (4 words) - 17:25, 26 June 2010
- 0 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 08:56, 26 June 2008
- 0 bytes (0 words) - 06:10, 13 April 2016
- 34 bytes (4 words) - 15:55, 8 August 2014
- ...may wish to avoid them. This list may be an aid to those users. To exclude packages, add their names to an ''exclude'' directive in the ''/etc/yum.conf'' file, Fedora does not ban offensive language in packages.2 KB (239 words) - 11:57, 15 July 2011
- {{OldGuidelinePage|deprecating-packages}} {{DISPLAYTITLE:Guidelines for Deprecating Fedora Packages}}4 KB (550 words) - 19:57, 21 December 2018
- ...elease of what was "OLPC 9.1" into a "Fedora 11 release", and to bring the packages outside of the current Fedora process inside of it. If we can get it done == Packages branched from Mainline ==14 KB (2,085 words) - 12:43, 16 July 2009
- [[Category:Packages|mksh]]966 bytes (160 words) - 19:33, 15 December 2008
- ...isor. It has since been replaced by [https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/qemu qemu]3 KB (399 words) - 10:35, 3 July 2010
- ! Use Case !! No. !! seed packages | [[Base/Packages/m1|Minimal chroot]] || align="right"|15 || glibc, bash568 bytes (65 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013
- #REDIRECT [[Archive:L10N Important packages]]45 bytes (6 words) - 12:13, 25 May 2010
Page text matches
- = Modified packages = == Updated packages ==276 bytes (23 words) - 11:21, 9 January 2009
- === Packages === [[Image:Myfedora-sitemap-packages.png|500px|Click to view larger version]]209 bytes (21 words) - 14:09, 20 July 2009
- * Fedora page (with testing packages): [http://tsmetana.fedorapeople.org/ tsmetana.fedorapeople.org] == Packages ==515 bytes (70 words) - 10:02, 12 March 2009
- An installation using all packages made available by anaconda. This can be accomplished two ways: ...this test is to ensure proper package ordering given a large enough set of packages.600 bytes (82 words) - 17:19, 16 February 2009
- ...only the bits that are not conflicting with KDE3). So lets' see, what KDE4-Packages are ready to compile. | '''Application''' || '''Missing headers etc.''' || '''Upstream packages''' || '''Solution'''861 bytes (128 words) - 16:28, 24 May 2008
- = Packages Needing Bootstrap = ...ould be rebuilt between Fedora Core revisions. This helps us avoid having packages that are linked against old versions of libraries and fail to compile with872 bytes (143 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- ! Use Case !! No. !! seed packages | [[Base/Packages/m1|Minimal chroot]] || align="right"|15 || glibc, bash568 bytes (65 words) - 14:24, 6 December 2013
- ==Packages To Be Removed== ==Apps To Be Removed From Larger Packages==501 bytes (77 words) - 18:56, 14 June 2010
- MinGW source packages have a circular dependency: == Bootstrap packages ==2 KB (276 words) - 14:54, 24 November 2008
- == Packages == I (co-)maintain the following packages for Fedora:887 bytes (135 words) - 03:49, 4 March 2009
- ...that they are installed rather than Core packages. And when such important packages are replaced it can be ''very'' difficult to remove them.667 bytes (104 words) - 22:48, 2 June 2008
- ...elements are not too big. We may just need one query here to ask for all packages you maintain and own (own is a subset of maintain) sorted by owned and subs ...nd links to their info page. We need a fast query in pkgdb to ask for all packages that is owned by a user and get a count. I don't think the DB was structur1 KB (209 words) - 14:08, 20 July 2009
- == Proposed Packages to be included in Live CD (already in Fedora) == * We are first working to include these packages in Fedora, the list of packages to be in Live CD will come later. Please, follow-up all work throught [[SIG317 bytes (49 words) - 16:26, 24 May 2008
- == Noarch Packages == ...of arch independent data should be packaged to noarch subpackages. Noarch packages and subpackages must contain the same content no matter on which architectu750 bytes (107 words) - 18:47, 27 January 2009
- === Documentation Packages with Embedded OS versioning === Documentation packages (as approved by the Fedora Documentation Project) can be named with the OS438 bytes (62 words) - 17:42, 31 March 2009
- The packages in EPEL mainly follow the Fedora Packaging Guidelines -- that includes [[Pa But there are some exceptions for packages in EPEL, which are listed below.1 KB (162 words) - 01:16, 3 June 2008
- The packages listed below failed to rebuild for FC4 Development around 2005-04-11 after All failed packages with build log were reported in bugzilla on 2005-04-28.550 bytes (81 words) - 16:35, 24 May 2008
- == Packages ==385 bytes (55 words) - 16:32, 24 May 2008
- ...far. Documentation packages have unique constraints and quirks which other packages do not have.273 bytes (37 words) - 01:24, 1 December 2009
- == Review Requests for Packages I Submitted == == Packages that I am Maintainer or Co-maintainer ==2 KB (321 words) - 20:29, 19 September 2016