From Fedora Project Wiki
Page title matches
File:Feature-process-flow.png (1,078 × 833 (101 KB)) - 17:51, 1 August 2008- * Name: [[User:Rjones| Richard Jones]] We propose to add a feature which allows the host administrator, at their discretion, and only of limit4 KB (591 words) - 21:14, 28 March 2015
- 56 bytes (10 words) - 12:31, 9 June 2016
File:F13-feature-profiles)markedup.pdf ...d up some proposed changes to layout/formatting on this version of the f13 feature profiles pdf.(470 KB) - 16:36, 3 June 2010- The Feature Process has proven itself to be clunky. We need to think about changes to Perhaps the most problematic issue with the Feature Process is that it is really meant to address three separate needs with som2 KB (376 words) - 17:18, 22 March 2011
- == Feature Wrangler Review (2009-07-16) ==342 bytes (43 words) - 15:38, 22 March 2010
File:F13-feature-profiles final2.pdf Final layout PDF for the F13 Feature Profiles(385 KB) - 22:10, 23 June 2010- == Feature Enhancements ==130 bytes (16 words) - 20:55, 16 September 2009
- ...inition]], but here are some questions to ask yourself before engaging the feature process. ...equires a very simple intervention to revert behavior is not necessarily a feature.827 bytes (122 words) - 20:37, 8 August 2008
File:Lxde-feature-sample.png (232 × 80 (13 KB)) - 03:50, 9 July 2011- ...lines two complementary ways to slim down FESCo's time commitment with the Feature Process. == Delegate power to drop to the Feature Wrangler ==7 KB (1,208 words) - 00:38, 26 September 2014
- 37 bytes (4 words) - 18:11, 22 January 2009
- 6 KB (936 words) - 18:46, 13 February 2013
- ...e pages that meet the QA requirements, at least for the given point in the Feature cycle.4 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:53, 22 January 2009
- ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature2 KB (203 words) - 16:10, 23 April 2018
- 44 bytes (3 words) - 21:31, 26 February 2009
- 82 bytes (8 words) - 20:06, 26 January 2022
- 8 KB (1,249 words) - 08:01, 16 October 2009
- ...me to look for specific bugs for a package (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package you are checking). ...https://bugz.fedoraproject.org/packagename (replace 'packagename' with the name of the package) and click on 'Report a new bug against this package' link.15 KB (2,111 words) - 13:43, 20 March 2012
- 16 KB (2,654 words) - 16:36, 6 December 2012
Page text matches
- = Fedora Feature Dashboard = {{Admon/note | This page is maintained by the [[JohnPoelstra| Feature Wrangler]] --he gets less confused if he is the only person making changes2 KB (233 words) - 09:35, 24 June 2010
- == Feature: Empathy - [[Features/Empathy]] == FESCo approved Empathy as a Fedora 12 feature by a 7-0 vote.633 bytes (84 words) - 08:05, 18 September 2016
- = Feature Writer = ...st developers and package maintainers with the creation and maintenance of feature pages734 bytes (96 words) - 22:27, 14 July 2008
- ..., as described in the feature process documentation that is linked on your feature page template. If you need help, let me know via my email address. --[[User328 bytes (55 words) - 22:53, 11 July 2011
- Describe the dimensions of tests that this feature is expected to pass when it is done. If it needs to be tested with differe ...sting is OK, but it's much better to document what *I* can do to test your feature.1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 03:26, 26 February 2009
- ...on on what feature profiles are or how this deliverable was created, see [[Feature profiles SOP]]. ! Feature2 KB (203 words) - 16:10, 23 April 2018
- = Feature Writer = ...st developers and package maintainers with the creation and maintenance of feature pages769 bytes (100 words) - 02:46, 26 February 2009
- The name of the release is '''Fedora 7''', unlike previous ones which featured 'Core Feature freeze:: All features must be complete in a testable state. Anything that's2 KB (234 words) - 16:25, 24 May 2008
- == Feature Testing == ...Test 1. It is useful to test these specific items in the test release the feature was enabled subsequent test releases to make sure there are no regressions.974 bytes (130 words) - 16:33, 24 May 2008
- == Feature Wrangler Review (2008-12-16) == == Feature Page fixes (2008-12-18) ==311 bytes (43 words) - 12:46, 18 December 2008
- ...o requirements by FESCO/FPC. Please submit a new feature proposal for this feature which has been adjusted to meet those requirments and outlines those change323 bytes (53 words) - 09:04, 2 April 2020
- == Feature Wrangler Review == # All sections of the feature form must contain information, including "How To Test"440 bytes (64 words) - 21:34, 22 November 2009
- ...nounce mailing list for broader community review. No sooner than one week, feature is sent to [[:Category:FeatureReadyForFesco | FESCo for final approval]]. * Other feature categories: [[:Category:FeaturePageIncomplete]] | [[:Category:FeatureReadyF1 member (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 19:36, 29 January 2013
- ...status is show as a percentage under the ''Current Status'' section of the feature page. ...rcentage completion does not reflect the level of unfixed bugs or that the feature has been fully tested.2 KB (336 words) - 15:33, 9 December 2011
- * finishing the Feature Page '''finishing the Feature Page'''871 bytes (114 words) - 16:00, 10 July 2012
- ...for this feature to land in Fedora 19 a bit later this spring. Moving the Feature itself to Fedora 20. That said, perhaps we can still schedule a test day f282 bytes (50 words) - 22:20, 19 March 2013
- ...for this feature to land in Fedora 19 a bit later this spring. Moving the Feature itself to Fedora 20. That said, perhaps we can still schedule a test day f282 bytes (50 words) - 22:20, 19 March 2013
- ...dora community member can introduce a feature, using our [[Features/Policy|feature process]]. === Feature ===2 KB (234 words) - 14:08, 18 September 2016
- == Incomplete feature ==193 bytes (18 words) - 15:31, 22 January 2009
- === F9 Feature Process === * FESCo approved the following feature for F9:2 KB (240 words) - 16:34, 24 May 2008